This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

I have reverted it. If not enough sources is a problem, then it is also a problem for the PCem article this is being redirected to, as it has even fewer sources (literally only one 3rd party page, its own website, and, ironically enough, the 86Box website used as a source for 86Box's existence). And as for it not being in-depth enough - how is that supposed to occur when the article got reverted only a day after its creation? - OBrasilo (talk) 13:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are the differences between 86box and PCem? What was the reason for the fork? 24.5.198.222 (talk) 04:18, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]