This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Mathematics Low‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

"Abramowitz and Stegun is a modern successor" is tremendously innacurate. How does this type of post survive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.157.15.15 (talk • contribs) 2006-02-27T18:57:19‎

Would you like to explain that? We are talking about authoritative texts on special functions. If you want to make the point that A&S is not a comparable text on the side of analysis, yes, that can be mentioned. Charles Matthews 14:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fifth edition was published by Cambridge University Press in 2021. It has been revised and digitally reset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjt1949 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]