The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PulseTrain → Pulse train – I assume that this article was intended as a replacement for the existing pulse train redirect — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 14:58, 8 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this need a discussion? kbrose (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It needs a discussion because this appears to be a WP:CONTENTFORK of the existing redirect target, pulse wave. Is "pulse train" distinct enough from "pulse wave" to support two separate articles, or should we have only one article, and if so which one? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I don't recall why I arrived at this page. There is no question that the current title cannot stand. It must be renamed to something else, as the title is non-conforming to the English standards and it is clearly not a proper name.

On first glance, this article covers nothing different than the existing article and must be merged. Perhaps a merge will improve the existing artlcle and vice versa, as both seem equally bad in two opposing directions. kbrose (talk) 22:37, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]