Archives

1

		The Jain Barnstar
		For your contribution to the 'Jainism' related articles. --(nimit)

Thank you :D-- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 14:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Hi Pankaj, thanks for your contribution to government related projects. You are valuable for Wikipedia. Keep it up. Thanks again.-- Human3015TALK  10:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou Human3015 :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 11:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you Pankaj for your fantastic contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Jainism. I have been following your edits and it is heartening to note that you have brought new enthusiasm to 'Jainism' related articles. Your articles on Jain monks and Jain temples are very important. Keep up the great work, looking forward to working with you. Aayush18 (talk) 04:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Aayush18 :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I've seen you a couple of times, and just wanted to thank you for your continuous, helpful contributions. Cheers! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Coming from you, this means a lot. :D -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Resilient Barnstar
	For your ceaseless efforts at Mahavira, Digambara and Jain monasticism despite the major issues we had to face. I am sure you will learn from these reviews and it will help you write a lot of wonderful articles in the future! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Jain Barnstar
		For your contribution to the Jainism related articles. --Nizil (talk) 07:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou Nizil Shah -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Invitation on Historical India.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
• Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
• Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,635		Cancer (talk)	Add sources
27		Political families of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana (talk)	Add sources
36		Brothers (Yu novel) (talk)	Add sources
130		Kinjarapu Yerran Naidu (talk)	Add sources
158		Trail running (talk)	Add sources
66		Bhaskaravarman (talk)	Add sources
37,950		Indian Premier League (talk)	Cleanup
58		National Highway 3 (India) (talk)	Cleanup
12		National Highway 179A (India) (talk)	Cleanup
10		International Dennis Gabor Award (talk)	Expand
144		Santosh Gangwar (talk)	Expand
85		Ramesh Bais (talk)	Expand
23		Daniel Ndambuki (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
147		Social reformers of India (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
31		Gender pay gap in India (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17		Proprioception and motor control (talk)	Merge
102		Body privilege (talk)	Merge
17		CFRE-DT (talk)	Merge
52		Social security in France (talk)	Wikify
28		Central Monitoring System (talk)	Wikify
334		Nayantara Sahgal (talk)	Wikify
57		Rajputs in Himachal Pradesh (talk)	Orphan
3		A Forgotten Ambassador in Cairo (talk)	Orphan
3		Alvin Joseph (talk)	Orphan
140		Mint chocolate chip (talk)	Stub
5		Awetu River (talk)	Stub
50		Adireddy Bhavani (talk)	Stub
4		Pamela J. Lauria (talk)	Stub
113		Sulata Deo (talk)	Stub
31		Adireddy Srinivas (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,233 round points from 24 good articles, 28 Did you know articles, and one In the news nomination, mainly about athletes and politicians
• Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 1,127 round points, almost entirely from two high-multiplier featured articles on Black Widow (Natasha Romanova) and Grace Coolidge, in addition to two GAs and two reviews
• History6042 (submissions) with 1,088 round points from four featured lists about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and a good topic mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews
• Arconning (submissions) with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews

In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]