Pular para o conteúdo

Conheça Walt Disney World

User talk:MichaelMaggs

This talk page is automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. Any sections older than 90 days are automatically archived.

Subscriptions are at User talk:MichaelMaggs/Subscriptions

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Short description format

Hi, since you are another member of wikiproject short descriptions, I was wondering if you have any idea what would be a good short descriptions idea for the annual Pulitzer Prize articles (such as 1972 Pulitzer Prize). Everything in use (search insource:"short description" intitle:"Pulitzer Prize " prefix:"1" is subpar, and does not explain what the Pulitzer is.

Thanks, -1ctinus📝🗨 01:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@1ctinus I agree that "Pulitzer" needs to be explained in all those examples. I'd suggest something like "Award for American journalism and arts". The official definition includes "letters" as well, but that's a minor aspect that could be omitted to keep the SD short. MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:07, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Following your undo of The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle

Hi Michael. You undid an edit I did following a request to expand the lead section of the page.

I went over your comments and as I'm still learning, I would appreciate if you could comment on the following.

  1. You mentioned the use of American grammar and spelling. Is that an issue? I have been using American grammar, style and spelling for all my edits with no problems or comments so far, so just wondering if you could elaborate more on this.
  2. Regarding the penultimate sentence, I thought it was not appropriate to list all the adaptations to film and radio/audio, as there are numerous adaptations and they appear in detail later in the page. The book on the other hand was the only version mentioned so I quoted it. Should I have not quoted anything (i,e just mention there are various adaptations to video, audio and books), or should I have references examples from the TV and radio sections so as not to make the book reference look random? Thanks for your input, It's a learning process :-).

Sablc4747 (talk) 08:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message here. On the variety of English, have a look at WP:RETAIN and WP:TIES. The article also has a specific template Use British English . So this article needs "humour" rather than "humor" and "Mr" (without a full stop/period) rather than "Mr.". On the second point, WP:LEAD says that the lead should be "a concise overview of the article's topic". So, a general overview rather than a mention of specific examples. Sometimes a particular example may be so important in context that it merits a mention in its own right, but that's not the case here. The other factor to watch for is the need to comply with WP:OR and WP:V when creating the overview. Editors often slip in comments such as "one of the best known" or "the most popular", which always need a source. AI loves generating that sort of filler statement. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fiction guideline

For the sake of users seeking guidance, this edit needs to be adopted. You seem like the only one who might do that, though I doubt there is much actual content-based objection to most of those changes. If someone wants to re-add something, they should first check to see whether it might be redundant to something else on the page, and also consider whether it is actually helpful to those seeking guidance. Any article cited as an example should be checked very closely; this is also why I am skeptical about the list of articles that supposedly adhere to this guideline.

If this edit is not adopted, I am not sure how much if anything will ever get done here. Again, we need to consider users who are seeking guidance. 221.158.136.11 (talk) 03:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for updating and adding short descriptions to articles on Wikipedia. With your help, the WikiProject's top 3000 list has been cleared for March 2025 already! Your work has made Wikipedia better :-). LR.127 (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That’s nice, thanks! MichaelMaggs (talk) 04:35, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken Description

Hi there, you may have made changes to the bot since this edit - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eucalyptus_salubris&oldid=1009834723 - but I thought you'd want to be notified. It said that this tree is a grass. I've corrected the page. 220.235.78.155 (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall in any detail I'm afraid, as that was over four years ago. Thanks for fixing it. MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:04, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for updating and adding short descriptions to articles on Wikipedia. With your help, the WikiProject's top 3000 list has been cleared for April 2025, the second month in a row! Your work has made Wikipedia better :-). LR.127 (talk) 12:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks! MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]