The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Pearson (1943-) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does not establish notability per WP:N. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not a significant person, no " significant coverage " Arma virumque cano (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not establish notability, no information out there on this person that I could find. Fails the general notability guideline. — Jake Wartenberg 16:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, doesn't even really claim importance. Going to agree that he doesn't meet the WP:BIO guideline. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.