The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Countryhumans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROD removed by page's creator. Subject lacks notability and significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 02:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There are no reliable sources that discuss this subject. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 08:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. This comes nowhere close to the threshold of notability or encyclopedia-worthy content. Fifthavenuebrands (talk) 09:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - simply doesn't meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:GNG, as already said by the above editors. Aoba47 (talk) 16:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Is this a meme? A site? Whatever it is, it is not even well referenced. WP:TNT at best. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:48, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.