The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dario Roberts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page. Clear COI issues since page was created by an author who's named exactly as one of the subject's companies (see Bahabeach). A WP:BEFORE shows a lack of coverage from reliable sources, and notability is also somewhat lacking. No clear indication that subject warrants an encyclopedic article. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, and Bahamas. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Allow the article to continue, you will see there are many more articles to be added in the up and coming days to that adds to the validity of this subject. Ho many more articles are in Wikipedia with even less content than this one. Let's give it a some time and allow even more content to the full article. Bahabeach (talk) 19:44, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not about whatever content is in the Wikipedia article, but whether there are Reliable sources that cover Dario Roberts. Hmr (talk) 04:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Self-promotional spam, with no evidence anywhere of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. JBW (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: PROMO, appears to be for crypto. This is a PR item [1], about the same level of coverage used for the other sources in the article. Oaktree b (talk) 23:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I checked the sources, none of them were WP:RS (mostly advertorials), so I deleted them. Seems unlikely that better sources will appear. The account denied having a COI, but given the evidence (account name, edits), that denial is hardly credible. — Chrisahn (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really relevant to whether this article should be deleted, Chrisahn, but you may be interested to know that the account made some edits in 2019, which were deleted. Those edits were on another subject which was also connected to Dario Roberts. Considering those edits as well as the recent ones, the denial is not remotely credible. JBW (talk) 10:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Latestly, which Yahoo appears to have syndicated, is a low quality content feed, the Forbes contributor piece isn't RS either and lacks WP:SIGCOV at that. Nothing points to notability at this time imo Hmr (talk) 04:51, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete promotional not notable subject, no reliable sources. Cinder painter (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no reliable sources found written in promotional POV. Gauravs 51 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.