The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –MuZemike 23:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gearslutz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB. Coverage I can see are alexa rankings (which aren't useful) and an interview on an unreliable website concerning the guy who designed the site. Ironholds (talk) 06:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. OTRS ticket 2010062810007634 strongly suggests that this article was created by the owner of the site, which is unlikely. However, it was created by a self-confessed thrice-banned member of the site, which is a conflict of interest and is supported by the contributions of the article's creator. Long story short: doesn't, in my opinion, meet the notability requirements and has COI issues. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 10:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Regardless of the claims made at our help desk, I am not the owner or the administrator of that site but joining the forum DID result in COI issue. Sorry! Jrod2 (talk) 17:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.