Lisa Yamada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article seems entirely pulled from BLP's IMDb page. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "Article seems entirely pulled from BLP's IMDb page" is just a completely untrue accusation, this is demonstrable by the sourcing. Yamada has been part of several noteworthy productions in prominent roles, the subject passes WP:N. A complete rushjob of an AFD for a page barely an hour into existence, no time to even address potential notability qualms, nor the barrage of other grievances from the nominator. Nominator also failed to notify me about this nomination, had to see it on my watchlist. Rusted AutoParts 17:55, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The entirety of the "Filmography" section is pulled from IMDb, especially considering the non-Filmography portions do not contain citations for certain roles and/or information in the article. There is no reliable, third-party sourcing specific episode numbers Yamada has been in for The Bold and the Beautiful; that is a copyright vio, and also in violation of WP:IMDb/BLP. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:59, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    ....That's literally the format of *any* filmography table, listing someone's filmography in chronical order is not owned by IMDB. You know this, you'd edited articles that have the exact same tables, yet have not seen the same grievance like you're airing here. Rusted AutoParts 18:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft Delete - Doesn't pass WP:ENT. Coverage is low, mostly from soap opera websites and magazines, and mostly about her character and not about her, so it doesn't pass WP:NBIO either. However Deadline Hollywood WP:RSPDEADLINE is considered a RS and has a few articles mentioning her. I did found [1] in abc.com, but it's not ABC News, it's a about the actress in a show. CBS, ABC and Deadline could be enough. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk)

I feel she satisifies ENT. She's a main role in Bold and the Beautiful, was a main role in Cruel Summer, and has been cast in a prominent recurring role in Elle. Perhaps there's a larger threshold needing to be crossed in terms of how many productions, but I feel this does demonstrate her as a notable name. Rusted AutoParts 18:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't found more sources. I'm convinced the article doesn't pass WP:NBIO. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Considering her roles in The Bold and the Beautiful and Cruel Summer, in addition to all the more minor roles, how does she fail WP:ENT? Mooonswimmer 07:47, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NACTOR states "The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". One main role in a notable TV show (The Bold and the Beautiful), one main role in a moderate TV show (7 episodes in Cruel Summer) and some other minor roles hardly qualify to meet WP:NACTOR. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 15:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Seems to pass WP:NACTOR to me, considering her roles in The Bold and the Beautiful and Cruel Summer. Mooonswimmer 07:46, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]