Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matjaž Vidmar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Peaceray (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Matjaž Vidmar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The plethora of sources contains only fleeting mentions that confirm some of the claims in this article which is little more than a potted CV. A reasonable, but not extensive BEFORE reveals more of the same but no in-depth treatment of the subject. In addition, many of the sources, of which some appear to be dead links, may be promotional for some enterprise. The article has the hallmarks of a commissioned work. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Slovenia. Shellwood (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This has WP:BROCHURE written all over it. Looks like the user who created this page already tried this in their sandbox, and it was speedy deleted per U5. Kylemahar902 (talk) 23:09, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Highly promotion brochure article. Lots of passing mentions. No indication of signficance. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 17:04, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: No WP:SIGCOV from the references, fails WP:GNG. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 17:19, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.