Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mid Banesore
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I accorded greater weight to the arguments that sources were lacking. Certainly, if sources exist to create a proper article at Ghattekulo, there is no prejudice to doing so. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mid Banesore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A search for references found no support for the content of this article. Web is all mirrors and gBooks is no hits, fails WP:N and WP:V, prod removed with comment "Removed Prod - WP:V is an issue but with a geographic area this should be discussed (or speedied if a hoax) rather than prodded"[1] JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm having trouble figuring out what this article is supposed to be about. A city? A district? A region? A geographical feature? It looks like a bad translation from something. --Oakshade (talk) 02:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and move to Ghattekulo, the neighbourhood of Kathmandu that the article is actually about. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note recently added content is WP:OR working with the author to find sources User_talk:RajeshPandey#Mid_Banesore, I check the alternate spelling provided, and did not find good sources for "Mid Baneshwor" JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.