The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. KuyaBriBriTa's comments about BLPPROD process are, I note, correct, the BLPPROD could have been readded to this article. joe decker^{talk to me} 21:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rodney Sneijder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail wp:athlete as hasn't played yet. Prod contested GedUK  20:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and perhaps salt, as this article has been deleted three times in the past (twice via speedy and once with the BLP prod). No evidence of notability, no citations, and its a borderline candidate for another speedy. This is an example of why a BLP prod shouldn't be removed with the addition of nonreliable sources (in this case, a link to a forum). ThemFromSpace 21:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. I agree with the SALTing suggestion as well. GiantSnowman 14:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:NFOOTY as he hasn't played at a fully-pro level yet. Lack of significant media coverage to pass WP:GNG. --Jimbo^[online] 14:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unreferenced BLP about a footballer who fails both WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Without significant coverage, or an appearance in a fully pro league, he does not meet our inclusion criteria. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life^talk 15:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural note: This was not a contested prod; the article creator removed a BLP prod tag after adding an unreliable source (i.e. a link to a forum). The BLP prod tag should have been re-added (and if I had noticed it first, I would have done so) since per policy the tag can be re-added if no reliable sources are added to the article. But what's done is done, and AfD is more than capable of adjudicating this. Delete as failing WP:NFOOTY and WP:BIO. Salt due to repeated re-creation; protection can be lifted if and when he meets criteria. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.