Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terri Summers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 21:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Terri Summers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete Biography with two sources, both unreliable. Notability assertion does nto go beyond WP:HOTTIE. Guy (Help!) 12:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with above.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 12:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteDoes not meet PORNBIO, has no reliable sources. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Terri Summers (birthdate matches) has made a few porn films. I don't think by itself this reaches the WP:PORNBIO bar, but whatever we do to source hardcore pr0n actresses would be worth a try. Since this person seems to exist, I would not object to Wikipedia:Userfication until notability can be established. / edg ☺ ☭ 16:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete less than notable. - Schrandit (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Damn, she really is a HOTTIE. When it comes to notability though... NOTTIE. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 02:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Many sources at http://www.myspace.com/terrisummers1 78.55.203.243 (talk) 12:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- — 78.55.203.243 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete - I had prodded this article before. There is no indication of notability. EuroPride (talk) 22:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I don't have time to research it now or in the coming few days but if this is deleted, please userfy it to my user space. I'll try to find a few sources for the claims. Being Pet of the Month in seven countries seems like an unusual thing and if true may be able to be sourced. Dismas|(talk) 00:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't think a myspace page counts as WP:RS. Concur with above observations on failing notability guidelines. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 17:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete I removed the Prod actually. She was Pet of the month in 5 countries and Pet of the Year in the Netherlands, however the only definitive source, Penthouse.com, does not make this information available for free. Pretty frustrating really, but I guess I did not think sources would be this hard to find. If I could figure out what year she posed in Penthouse I could possibly find it on archive.org, but I can't even find that. Please userfy to Dismas, I'll improve it if I feel inclined. - Stillwaterising (talk) 04:18, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.