The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Next Web (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequate refs for notability. Almost everything here is their own site. I couldn't find the Wired UK item, but it alone wouldn't support this article. And promotional writing--the tell-tell "to improve your personal and professional life" is representative. DGG ( talk ) 03:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I'm not finding any WP:RS to indicate sufficient notability. Safehaven86 (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and this is an amusing one because it's largely used by companies of which we delete themselves entirely, so there's therefore questionability of guranteed non-PR, since that's exactly why churnalism exists and is exists quite so. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete In agreement with SwisterTwister . People/ companies are using this as source for their notability. Nothing here itself. Light2021 (talk) 20:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete as it stands - given it is in fact a minor RS, I'm actually surprised there's nothing about the site or company itself that I could find either - David Gerard (talk) 09:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.