Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wajdi al-Hajj Ali
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wajdi al-Hajj Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:BIO1E, this figure has only received coverage due to one event which he didn't have a significant role in, and likely wouldn't have been deemed notable enough to warrant a separate article (which is reflected in the article's rather small size and detail). Asclepias tuberosa (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Syria. Asclepias tuberosa (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Although I am the creator, I am aware that it was only highlighted by conflicts. Farcazo (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - This is a instance of WP:BLP1E, as nom said. There is no secondary coverage aside from this event about the subject, which means that there is no real reason to believe that this subject is notable enough to have their own separate article. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom
- - RamiPat (talk) 00:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Spirituality. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a case of WP:BIO1E. Neither the person nor the event is notable. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 06:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete While there do seem to be some RSes to support inclusion, this is a textbook instance of WP:BIO1E. Therefore, I think its best to delete unless we have other things that can bolster notability outside of the one thing he is known for. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 22:48, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.