The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 04:26, 3 November 2009 [1].

• Featured article candidates/Mandy Moore/archive1
• Featured article candidates/Mandy Moore/archive2

• Featured article review/Mandy Moore/archive1

Notified: Jack O'Lantern, Plastikspork

I am nominating this featured article for review on behalf of an IP, who feels that this article may not meet the FA standards. This article was promoted in August 2006, but due to a variety of factors, I (and others) believe that its status should be reconsidered. See here. Enigma^msg 04:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Please add alt text to images; see WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 04:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, lead, alt text. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist, 2c, 1c
  1. 2c Citation styles not consistent
     1. Date styles all over the shop
     2. Needs a fine tooth comb
     3. fn 6 totally unacceptable
     4. fn 8 BLP vio?
     5. fn 9 broken template use
     6. fn 9-11 lack date
     7. general lack of authors
     8. fn 35 lacks retrieval date
     9. fn 42 lacks article title
     10. fn 47-49 not citations, simply linkspam.
     11. fn 50 not a cite
     12. fn 69 citation not in style
     13. fn 83 not a cite
     14. Magazines and Journal names not italicised as per style used here
  2. 1c Unverified non trivial claims
     1. fn 42 SELF
     2. fn 48 SELF
     3. fn 87 SELF
     4. fn 100 incorrectly cited broadcast => unverified.
  3. If you want to fix it: consistent styling of titles (ie: Italics). All authors attributed. All dates consistent. Remove SELF. Replace links with citations. Indicate issue number, volume number, date correctly for all items published. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.