The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting portal as per conclusion of previous multiple portal deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Britney Spears. Nominator expresses no judgement, positive or negative, regarding proposed deletion at this point. John Carter (talk) 21:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The topic of this portal is relatively limited, but the content is of reasonable quality. This portal is maintained by an active wikiproject. I see no reason to delete. Cenarium (talk) 18:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Valuable project tool, source of aggregate information invaluable to research. – B.hotep ^u/_t• 19:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per Cenarium; not sure it is really needed, but does no harm. Johnbod (talk) 19:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Main article is featured status and good potential for other articles within its scope. Content is of good standard as noted by Cenarium.--Alf ^melmac 08:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.