• Jeeny (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• GeeAlice (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Humain-comme (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Biomet (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F
• Supporting evidence: block log

User:GeeAlice account was created shortly after User:Jeeny was indefinitely blocked. Both have a very similar editing pattern, including disruption and stalking. I am apparently not the only person who thinks User:GeeAlice was editing under a different name [1] (posted by a user was close to User:Jeeny). When this message was posted on her talk page, it was quickly archived [2]. Unfortunately, User:Jeeny's talk page was deleted so I am unable to provide more evidence, such as a blocked IP number for example, so I brought forth what I could find. Found past AN/I reports [3], [4] — Zerida 00:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why this person is posting complaints to different "notice" boards, which is really obvious a retaliation over a tag I place on the Image:Egyptians.jpg to rename to "Image:Egyptians collage.jpg", in order to be less cryptic. He used popups to revert my edits, saying it's "not nec". Instead of leaving it for the admin to decide. Why? Egyptians.jpg is very vague for the image of a collage of individual images. My first proposal was to rename it to "Egyptian people collage" but changed it in order to compromise, after he said it was "too long", to Egyptians collage.jpg. I don't understand the lengths this person has gone to punish me, and remove me from working on the projects. I could have just re-named the image myself, but didn't. In fact, this person is being very disruptive, and is proposing an invasion of my privacy to intimidate me. All because of a rename tag on an image? This person did not communicate with me, until after he posted to the administrator's notice board, the 3rr board, and this one, until someone mentioned they did not see a notice on my page. Then he left one after that. Why? He said I was being disruptive by pointing to WP:POINT to tag an image for renaming after I posted to his talk page asking why? I'm flabbergasted! I was not being disruptive. I've worked hard, volunteering my time here and this hassle has made me want to leave, my reason for deleting my page. This person is the disruptive one, by making so many complaints on so many different sites -- for a tag on an image??!!! This feels like abuse to me, and is very disruptive on Zerida's part. If anything, Zerida should be sanctioned for wasting my time, the community's, and those admins who have better things to do. This harassment has really upset me. I don't understand at all why someone would go to these extreme lengths over a rename tag on an image??!!! ←Gee♥Alice 03:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really sorry, Jeeny, but  Confirmed - Jeeny (talk · contribs) = Humain-comme (talk · contribs) = GeeAlice (talk · contribs) = BBhounder (talk · contribs)

 Stale - Biomet (talk · contribs)

 IP blocked - also logging out to edit-war and disrupt RFCU - Alison ^❤ 09:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: blocked all indef and tagged the confirmed accounts. -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:43, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also  Confirmed Jayron (talk · contribs) FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 17:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]