Pular para o conteúdo

Conheça Walt Disney World

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JohnGotten/Archive


JohnGotten

JohnGotten (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

05 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

177.133.241.249 was blocked on 2 February for disruptive editing. Igornotter appeared several days later with the same POV. Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

For sure, this is the same IP. Jingiby (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk declined - checkusers do not publicly disclose the connection between an IP address and account. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: I guess if you squint hard enough, you could call this block evasion, but basically we encourage people to create accounts, so blocking somebody as a sock because they created an account seems kind of backwards. If Igornotter is making disruptive edits, they can be blocked for that, but I don't see this as socking. In theory, this case should be renamed before archiving, but perhaps consider just deleting it in lieu of archiving. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Case moved to the account — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: I disagree completely with this close. We encourage people who aren't blocked to create accounts, not the ones blocked for disruption. We block the person behind the IP, not just the IP itself, so evading via an account is not permitted. Igornotter is clearly the same as the IP, and I suspect the IP was already evading a block of 179.95.100.211 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)). I also have a feeling there is an older master, but I will be indeffing the named account regardless as they are showing the same disruptive, edit-warring and nationalistic behavior. Sro23 (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Right back at it Elizium23 (talk) 05:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fairly likely this is the same person. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 12:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

14 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


  • Previous sockpuppets of JohnGotten include: Igornotter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)(blocked on February 7), Mariovespucio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)(blocked on February 8) and Moggein (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)(blocked on February 14). Moggein created their account on February 13 2021 at 03:28 and 30 minutes later joined an editing dispute at Dara of Jasenovac. Вукан Ц was putting forward the same POV and reverts (Вукан, Moggein) at Dara of Jasenovac from February 7 to February 12 and was inactive during Moggein's editing (13 Feb). After Moggein's block, they resurfaced on February 16 at Dara of Jasenovac.
  • And they've managed their userpages in the same manner as Mariovespucio and Moggein. Compare: Hello, this is my userpage/this is my talkpage (in Swedish - MarioVespucio), This is the userpage/this is the talkpage (in English - Moggein) and My homepage/my talkpage - Вукан Ц.
  • Side comment: The account Вукан Ц was created in 2019 and was used almost exclusively as support for a particular POV in !voting for a long time without any editing history. Their first edit was a vote. It highlights that this was probably not a new editor in 2019. The SPI archive may be linked to JohnGotten but there is probably an older account which is the real first account.
  • Pinging: @Oshwah: @Ymblanter: who handled the last report. Maleschreiber (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @RoySmith: The account's first edit was a !vote and much of its occasional editing involved RfC/RM until now. I don't think that there is a sufficient number of edits by any of the newer accounts for a good timecard, but [7] Moggein/Igornotter/Vukan plot very close closer to each other. It might just be a similar geolocation. I still think that a CU is justified, but if you don't consider it appropriate for the time being, I'll just have to accept it. If there is no sufficient reason for it, I understand why a CU in terms of privacy issues might not be a good idea.--Maleschreiber (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk declined - I'm not seeing enough commonality of behavior to make me suspect socking. The holocaust is a topic that many people are interested in and have strong POV about, so the overlap at Dara of Jasenovac by itself isn't a strong argument. I also see that Вукан Ц has an interest in other topics (British football, Academy Awards, etc) that the Gotten socks haven't exhibited. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, comparing the timecards of JohnGotten vs Вукан Ц, that's not screaming "sock" to me either. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately, when it comes to ethnic or nationalistic edit warriors and sockpuppetry, things will often get messy. The behavior is bit different here: there is a little bit of interest in non-Serbia topics, the account is much older, the user looks to be an established editor on the Serbian wikipedia, whereas JohnGotten seems to be more interested in the Portuguese wiki. Plus CU has been run recently and never picked up on this account. If new evidence arises, this SPI can always be reopened, but for now I'm closing the case with no action. Sro23 (talk) 00:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Pro forma: already CU-confirmed. Drmies (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 March 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Usual Serbian national tub thumping.

John based naming convention for socks JohnGotten, Johannesblitz, John L. Booth

Article overlaps

Alexander I of Yugoslavia [[8]]

[[9]]


Interest in Croatian flags

Flags [[10]] [[11]]


Here as other sock Johannesblitz adding the Nikola Tesla museum image to the Serbia articles

[[12]]

[[13]] Pipsally (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Additionally John L. Booth is now editing a favourite article of another JohnGottensock, Igornotter - Serbophilia Edit - [14]

Also this IP - {179.177.163.242} is restoring John L. Booth edits [15], while simulatneously fiddling with a talk page of an IP {179.177.163.249} which is clearly linked to JohnGotten and has been blocked by Alexf twice recently. [16]

{177.133.241.249} has clear overlaps with John L. Booth [17], editting Serbophilia, Greece–Serbia relations‎ and showing a specific interest in changing the Albanian names of Serbian Orthodox church buildings in kosovo

John L. Booth - [18]

{177.133.241.249} - [19], [20], [21]Pipsally (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is likely that this is John Gotten. @Pipsally: you have to request for a CU. Pinging admins familiar with JG @Ymblanter: @RoySmith:.--Maleschreiber (talk) 18:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Maleschreiber:Do I? How does one do that?Pipsally (talk) 18:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You have to use CUrequest as a parameter, see Template:SPI case status.--Maleschreiber (talk) 19:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @Pipsally: and @Maleschreiber:. It is most definitely them. And their agenda is quite clear. See here where they hyper-focus on Croatisation of Italians and Slovenes being exiled from Croatia failing to mention it was Italian occupational forces that persecuted Slovenes AND Croats. Odd thing to leave out, and then here where they make quite revolting attacks and backwards claims. One would be hatd pressed to find one positive edit in their history. Bit ironic but at least the puppet unmasked themselves. This person will just keep making accounts taking advantage of the limited admins we have on here. Now the puppet appears to be editing as much as possible before the inevitable end. Looks like what will come crashing down for all to see is this type of behavior on Wikipedia which has gotten worst the past two years in aggressive pov warriors that see the platform as a battlefield against “enemies”. OyMosby (talk) 04:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: This is unacceptable Perhaps @Peacemaker67: who has dealt with this sort of Wikipedia for a while now can share some insight? OyMosby (talk) 05:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sro23: Thanks for handling it. I'll do the cleanup Pipsally beat me to it. Good job. --Maleschreiber (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Blocked and tagged. I don't think CU is necessary as this one seems obvious enough. Closing. Also, does anyone want to clean up the sock's contributions? Sro23 (talk) 18:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06 May 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


So Booth is a CU match with Rafa (and I'm only halfway through), and Venize is Rafa. Fun fact: Venize is a match with User:JamesSandy64. I'm going to see about some range blocks. RandomCanadian, FYI. Drmies (talk) 23:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

19 May 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Already CU blocked. Ping for Vacant0. Drmies (talk) 12:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I didn't know I was editing an archive page, sorry for that. --Vacant0 (talk) 12:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar edits that JohnGotten has made in the past, it also has the same location as the first IP from February. JohnGotten has previously left similar comments on my talk page a couple of times already so I'm sure that they're sockpuppeting again. Requesting CU to check this. (talk page comment diff) Vacant0 (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/177.17.85.93, another Brazilian IP making the usual Serb nationalist edits, restoring those of the reported sock IP above. - This sock was blocked by @El C: this morning but has returned this afternoon as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/191.248.41.215

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


restoring edits by blocked socks 9 (both named and IP). There are loads of similar edits, adding Cyrillic names, and changing the order to Serbian Cyrillic comes first.-


Same interest in UNESCO heritage sites in Kosovo -

Interest in emphasising Serbian ethnicity in sports players

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Gamed autoconfirmed through sandbox edits, then immediately added a sock tag at User:Ariasalga, reverted an edit of theirs "per WP:DENY", and filed an SPI to the archive for Orchomen (the casepage being ECP'd). Looking at the history of Medieval Monuments in Kosovo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), I infer that to be Gotten, who edit-warred there as John L. Booth. El_C and Sro23 have since made a block apiece there and El_C has semi'd it, although neither noted a master. But the edit summary style is consistent with Special:Contributions/JamesSandy64, with capital-ar "Rv" (although no longer a dot), userpage blanking, and fighting other sox in the archives.

Also including Hunberct69, blocked by Sro23, who's clearly the same person as this. While I'm sure these two are sox of someone, I'd like CU (might have to be against log data) to be sure that it's Gotten and to rekindle the trail. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.

12 November 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Possibly a slew of new puppet accounts and IPs. A wide IP ban may be needed as this is a nonstop occurrence and abuse. An IP address @89.172.78.224: pointed this out on my talk page. See [[22]]. The IP is likely a sock of JohnGotten (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).He does editing with 177- 179 ip ranges these are some [[23]], [[24]], [[25]], [[26]], [[27]], [[28]], [[29]], [[30]], [[31]].OyMosby (talk) 14:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC) OyMosby (talk) 14:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The IP has now begun making disgusting personal attacks. OyMosby (talk) 17:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jack Frost: many thanks. Seems they moved on. Will re-open if they surgace again. Much appreciated! OyMosby (talk) 03:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Greeting. I suspected it was JohnGotten and informed the other editor. And maybe it is, because according to this, User: 177.98.150.152 is also from Brazil and has very similar edits as the others [[32]], and he was placed as a sockpuppets of JohnGotten https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_JohnGotten. 89.172.78.224 (talk) 16:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I've removed the master from the list. Obviously, the CU should be declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:56, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

28 December 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Per [33] and [34]. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

The same ip has been vandalizing wikipedia for many years and after being blocked it returns again from other IPs. It's about this ip [[35]] , and here he was blocked first for three months, then for a year, and came back again only from another IP [[36]] these are his edits a year ago [[37]] They are the same ip from the same place [[38]] in Brazil probably the same person which vandalizes wikipedia for years. This is an archive of the Sockpuppet JohnGotten investigation. I hope you can solve the problem. Thank you.89.172.83.150 (talk) 10:00, 20 August 2023 (UTC) 89.172.83.150 (talk) 10:00, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

fonte: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/JohnGotten/Archive
Marcações: