Pular para o conteúdo

Conheça Walt Disney World

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 April 17

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:38, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and just three entries. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and just two entries. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and just three entries. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and just three entries. The linked entries do not contain sources supporting the claim that the people won this award. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and just one entry. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and just two unlinked entries. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and just two entries. The one linked entry does not contain a source supporting the claim that the person won this award. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. I also do not see any indication at https://cin.ba/kontakti/ or any of the site's other pages that anything on that site is CC-licensed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 02:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With no actual episode articles, and all other links originating in other media than the TV series, it seems more like a collection of semi-related "See also" links, rather than a coherent series-specific navbox. --woodensuperman 15:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

this template should have been discussed following the deletion of all lang-xx templates, yet it seems to have been passed over. it should be replaced with the simpler templates {{langx}} and {{IPA}}. it also uses default formatting inconsistent with those templates. Juwan (talk) 08:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support and merge functionality with Module:Lang. After the previous TfD conversion while fixing pages I've encountered many instances of editors wanting to use features of {{langx}} in {{lang}}. The only reason why the above template wasn't merged, was because of that. Features like {{lang|ru|word|translit=translit}} or |lit= can, and should, be supported by Module:Lang (which can without much difficulty). Only the IPA value isn't currently available via langx. The only difference between langx and lang should be the language display, not the functionality of text. Gonnym (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support and merge per Gonnym; I will also note that literal translations are possible in langx templates. The existence of a separate "lang-rus" template, I would say, is redundant and makes it confusing as to which template is the correct one to use for the Russian language, particularly given it is visually and (as far as I'm aware) functionally identical to langx + IPA templates.
Mupper-san (talk) 10:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also support and merge with {{langx}}. Absolutiva (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Ahammed Saad (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – „don't fix it if it ain't broken“. The template has some extra functionality that may be broken by transitioning to lang-x, as has been discussed in the 2024 TFD. – Nar 260806:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lean support: I think it may be possible to deprecate lang-rus, based on how I converted one use of that template in Moscow Exchange to use langx and IPA (diff). In the IPA template, set the third parameter to ipa to replace "Russian pronunciation" with "IPA". --Minoa (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support While I do think it may be difficult and will result in some pages being damaged for some period, merging it will provide more significant benefits since we dont need to rely on multiple templates for the same purpose. NikolaiVektovich (talk) 15:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lean Opposed until langx all missing/unsupported features available in lang-rus have been accounted for and confirmed. Eulersidentity (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support and merge. Looking at the source code of the template, I can't see anything that cannot be easily supoporeted by other templates (as Juwan has described above). If we need to task a robot with ensuring that {{IPA}} and {{lit}} get implemented, as well as {{langx}}, that's hardly a significant problem, especially compared with the advantages of consolidating templates together like this. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 15:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge - there is no point in having this template when we have {{Langx}}. Gommeh (t/c) 21:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Merge with {{langx}} Gonna eatpizza (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge, assuming all information is maintained. — Goszei (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support so long as all functionality is implemented into Module:lang and/or {{langx}}. Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [T/C] 21:04, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:20th Century Studios theatrical animated features. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:20th Century Animation with Template:20th Century Studios theatrical animated features.
Substantial duplication between the two navboxes. No need for two when one can contain all relevant links. Think the then combined navbox could use some trimming, particularly the "related" section and brought more into line with WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. --woodensuperman 08:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image template. Gonnym (talk) 07:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table template. Gonnym (talk) 07:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.