The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2025 NCAA Division I Wrestling All-Americans (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with no transclusions and no main article. Links are sparse. We don't usually make navboxes to list people who are ranked #8 in competitions. The winners are listed at NCAA_Division_I_Men's_Wrestling_Championships#1999–2025, which is probably sufficient. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 10:40, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Konkuk University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This long navbox contains only one blue link (Konkuk University Law School) that actually goes to something related to the main topic. Not useful for navigation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seefooddiet (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 10:40, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Downtown Brampton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox template of unclear necessity, for the downtown core of a midsized city that already has a citywide navbox at {{Brampton}}. While I can find a few examples of "City" and "Downtown City" existing as separate navboxes for the same city, it's not at all the norm -- it's done only for a few major metropolitan global cities with populations in the millions, where a single citywide navbox has become too large to be useful, and is not routinely done across the board for every midsized or small city as an automatic matter of course. (And just for the record, Toronto — the city Brampton is effectively a suburb of — doesn't have a standalone Downtown navbox separately from its main city navbox, and I can't think of a reason why Brampton would be more in need of one of these than Toronto is.)
For contents in the box, further, there are just nine things linked in the box body: three of which are already in the citywide {{Brampton}} box as it is, while the other six could all easily be added to the citywide box without overloading it. And for transclusions, this is sitting alongside (not instead of) the citywide box on three of the four pages where it's been added, and alongside {{Brampton Transit navbox}} on the fourth, so deleting this wouldn't result in any loss of inbound links or navigability.
The main box isn't overpopulated enough to need separate subtemplates for different parts of the city, so this simply isn't necessary. Bearcat (talk) 15:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support, and speedy, if it's an option. The article it was created for (draft:Downtown Brampton, but they published it immediately) is a hot mess too. The template claims a school is in the downtown, yet the map in the article proves it isn't; claims a shopping mall within its boundary, same verdict from the map; claims a transit terminal is (Gateway), despite the fact if it was -- it's not -- then the shopping mall it's at would also be; claims three very distant neighbourhoods are within its boundaries. I've wiped those from the template, so now it has two links total. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 April 26. ✗plicit 00:35, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Kongregate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:OTI (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Very low number of invocations, template is not needed imo. Potentially Template:Country in the Eurovision Song Contest could be modified to include this contest as an option, however given the lack of existing articles at present I would be inclined to suggest deletion and if the need arises in future then merging functionality into this template should be considered. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 08:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This template does not get sufficient use and has simple alternatives such as just writing out the link. If its use becomes widespread in the future, it can be added as a functionality to the template the nom referred to. Grk1011 (talk) 13:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Junior Eurovision Song Contest venues (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The advantages to this navbox are minuscule, and the majority of points raised at WP:NAVBOX are not met. The link between these articles is tangential at best, and it's difficult to understand why this navbox would be needed to link these articles together. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 08:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Grk1011 (talk) 13:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 10:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.