Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Film. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Film|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Film. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

watch |
![]() |
Scan for Film AfDs |
- Related deletion sorting
Film
- Indradhanu (TV Channel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient significant coverage, at least in English. One article is not enough. There may be more coverage in Assamese, thus the AfD nomination instead of proposed deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Assam. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete There is nothing to satisfy WP:GNG. Lacks WP:SIGCOV.Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 10:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Shukla Sadan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film. Mekomo (talk) 14:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment This article has been moved to draftspace before (see Draft:Shukla Sadan and Draft:Draft:Shukla Sadan) and seems to be SELFPROMO (see User:SS (actor)) REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 16:30, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. The article is poorly written and badly formatted. It lacks adequate independent sources to establish notability.Chanel Dsouza (talk) 06:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Immediate deletion of this page should be done. very badly drafted page and also non-notable profile.Almandavi (talk) 07:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The poor writing and formatting are additional concerns, but the primary issue is the absence of sufficient independent sources to establish significant coverage.
Afstromen (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy delete; the creator is clearly evading a block, and the article is an LLM hallucination with no clear topic and no actual existing sources that mention it. --bonadea contributions talk 08:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Procedural note I've speedy deleted the article per WP:CSD#G5-- Ponyobons mots 15:46, 9 May 2025 (UTC).
- PurpleDOG Post Production (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not finding enough sources to meet WP:GNG/WP:ORG. All of the sources listed in the article fail in significant coverage. Additionally, an internet search did not turn up anything else of note. Maybe a Canadian film editor knows of more sources? JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 03:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:59, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:59, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:59, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:00, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:41, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- delete no significant coverage. --Altenmann >talk 04:04, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Neon Heart Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This film production company fails WP:NCORP. The sources are all the organization's own website(s) (not independent), IMDb (WP:USERGENERATED), or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. In this article, and in my WP:BEFORE search, I found no WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS to meet WP:ORGCRIT. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:26, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Companies. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:26, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:31, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – robertsky (talk) 02:10, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete All mentions in reliable sources are trivial and passing, and nothing else found. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Night Stream (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not have significant independent coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 09:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Is there any community consensus that short films cannot be redirected to list articles? According to a discussion at WP:FILM, films can redirect to list articles - are there any list articles that would be appropriate here? I'm not sure if films without articles (let alone short films) can be added to articles like List of American films of 2013 - however at the same time there does not seem to be any requirements on the page as far as inclusion goes. So with that in mind, this could probably be added and redirected to List of American films of 2013. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 22:09, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Nightstream. Non-notable self-promo. hinnk (talk) 09:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cinder painter (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- L Franchise (film series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage on sources as a film series; nor for a third film, which seems to be WP:CRYSTAL speculation at this point. Vestrian24Bio 10:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Vestrian24Bio 10:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom and WP:NFF. — Benison (Beni · talk) 11:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 11:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC) - Delete, per above. -Samoht27 (talk) 19:40, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - Franchise includes Lucifer (2019) and L2: Empuraan (2025), two of the highest-grossing Malayalam film series, with significant coverage in dependable sources. Meets WP:NFILM as well through substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources, such as reviews and box-office analyses for Lucifer and promotional coverage for L2: Empuraan in outlets like Times of India and Indian Express. WP:NFILM does not require a franchise to have a certain number of films to be notable. WP:CRYSTAL would only apply if the article includes unverified predictions or details about future developments. I guess you would argue the third film, L3: The Beginning. A source could be added about production information or a release date. Though, I'm still voting to keep this article. Editz2341231 (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- The films are notable per WP:NFILM, but no source discusses the franchise in substantial coverage. Vestrian24Bio 04:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Beyond a Doubt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Current sources are all unreliable, and my WP:BEFORE didn't turn up any better sources so as to establish notability through WP:NFILM. SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Ghana. SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: The pages that list Ghanian films by year do not include one for 2023. It may be worthwhile to either create a page for 2023 (and have this as the sole entry until others add more) or to combine the other films into a single article until there's enough to justify breaking it off by year. There's no list on the main page for cinema of Ghana, otherwise it could redirect there, I suppose. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 13:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Ganesha811 (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment There are only 3 years in the category "Lists of Ghanaian films" (1980, 2017, 2018), and an article List of Ghanaian submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film, which has only one entry, a film from 2018. List of Ghanaian films of 1983 redirects to an article about a film. There are articles about Ghanaian films from other years, just not included in lists. A list including this film would still need reliable sources - this article has only Youtube and IMDB as sources, so far, and on a quick search I haven't found other, reliable sources. I suspect a list with a single entry might get redirected to the film, which if the film is not notable ends up with a deletion anyway. So I would probably say delete at this point. Anyone with reliable sources would be able to write a new article, whether for this film or Ghanaian films from 2023, or whatever. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Old London (via WP:PROD on 8 May 2025)