Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment

WP:WPWP/ASSESS

Welcome to the assessment department of the Wikipedia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia-related articles (for scope, see the WikiProject page). While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Wikipedia articles by quality and Category:Wikipedia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Subpages

Popular pages: A bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles.

Frequently asked questions

See also the general assessment FAQ

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?: The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?: Just add {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?: Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
4. Who can assess articles?: Any member of WikiProject Wikipedia is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
5. How do I rate an article?: Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the detailed assessment scale below.
6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?: Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
7. What if I don't agree with a rating?: You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the detailed assessment scale below.
8. Aren't the ratings subjective?: Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
9. What if I have a question not listed here?: If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):


FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Wikipedia articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Wikipedia articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Wikipedia articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Wikipedia articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Wikipedia articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Wikipedia articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Wikipedia articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Wikipedia articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Wikipedia articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:


Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Wikipedia pages)		Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Wikipedia pages)		Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Wikipedia pages)		Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Wikipedia pages)		File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Wikipedia pages)		Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Wikipedia pages)		Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Wikipedia pages)		Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Wikipedia pages)		Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Wikipedia pages)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Wikipedia articles)		???

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Wikipedia|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):


Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Wikipedia articles)		Top
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Wikipedia articles)		High
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Wikipedia articles)		Mid
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Wikipedia articles)		Low
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Wikipedia articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Wikipedia articles)		???

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Wikipedia.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Assessment requests

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it:

On the article's Talk page, blank the class parameter like WikiProject banner shell|class=|.
The article is then immediately included at Category:Unassessed articles and associated WikiProject sub-categories.

OR

List the request below, and SIGN with four ~~~~ and then wait for the article's assessment. Note that due to the article's topic and/or the limited number of volunteers here at this wikiproject, and the backlog of requests, there may be a significant delay answering the request.

Requests from 2025

Requests from May 2025

Request assessment of Ait Zemmour Unrated. Thank you! Mayouhm (talk) 21:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Basidiospore, following its expansion Зэгс ус (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Sixtiers, Jgmac1106 (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Wadi Al Hayilah, thanks.LukasSimeone (talk) 11:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Wadi Atmar, thanks.LukasSimeone (talk) 11:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Everyone Hates Elon; page recently created and nominated for DYK. I already notified WikiProject Visual Arts, WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom and WikiProject London, but article hasn't been claimed by any WikiProject or received a quality assessment yet. Posting here just in case anyone has time to look over it. Thank you! :) Pineapple Storage (talk) 10:03, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of John Richard Robinson, to see whether it now meets C class article criterion. Many thanks. 82.38.214.91 (talk) 07:12, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Wadi Sifuni, thanks. LukasSimeone (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Wadi Awsaq, thanks. LukasSimeone (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Knowledge organization system - GardenMoth25 (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of François Mackandal OllieOllieBoBollie (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request assessment of Play House (Mumbai) User:Oxwin 19:27, 3 May 2025 (IST)

Request assessment of Julius Platzmann babbage (talk) 21:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request reassessment of Raktadaha River Somajyoti ✉ 16:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Bhima (Varendra king) Somajyoti ✉ 16:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Sarvamangala temple Somajyoti ✉ 16:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of North Bengal (West Bengal) Somajyoti ✉ 16:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of 2018 Bengali teacher recruitment movement Somajyoti ✉ 16:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Bangladesh-India Maitree Pipeline Somajyoti ✉ 16:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Roshu Kha Somajyoti ✉ 16:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Wadi Tawiyean, thanks.LukasSimeone (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Wadi Madnan, thanks. LukasSimeone (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Wadi Khabb (Fujairah), thanks. LukasSimeone (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Wadi Madha, thanks. LukasSimeone (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Bajirao I, Hello! I don't think this is a C class article anymore so kindly request reassessment please. Thank you in advance, Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 10:59, 01 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requests from April 2025

Request reassessment of Abdelmadjid Tebboune thanks Mayouhm (talk) 17:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of José Mangin. 30Four (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Haplogroup T-M184 — article is very long (readable prose is okay, but the article is mostly tables, and there are nearly 300 references). I've already added Template:Very long to the article (see talk page discussion). It's currently B-class; I have no experience of assessing articles, so I might be completely wrong, but my gut instinct is that Haplogroup T-M184 isn't ideal in terms of WP:Content assessment/B-Class criteria point 6 (The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way) and maybe also point 3 (The article has a defined structure). Pineapple Storage (talk) 13:38, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done reassessed as C class @Pineapple Storage. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:04, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of 2025 Nantes school stabbing. I feel like it might be C-class but I'm unsure, would like an outside opinion. 7kk (talk) 20:09, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of "McKinney Texas Temple". Thank you.Happyrain2121 (talk) 22:10, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Cantus Arcticus following expansion from stub. Thank you. Protalina (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of James Renner. The article is too long to be a WP:STUB. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Reguibat I think it should be at least c-class now. thanks Mayouhm (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assesment of Imlie Imsaneikigai (talk) 17:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of John Pinette, article needed lots of detail and reorganisation-- the blog source is a transcribed radio interview, I think you'll find it reliable? (IP user :/) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23c5:11e:f901:cd6d:99c0:9151:117 (talk) 16:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Braveland Conference - this was my first article and I have a special interest in getting it to Good Article status Moserjames79 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Big Eight Conference (Wisconsin) - article has had numerous updates since last assessment was performed and should be beyond Start-class at this point Moserjames79 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Prayer to Saint Joseph (Montfort)Sushidude21! (talk) 23:05, 22 April 2025
Request assessment of Grim (comic book) MrGlassWontBreak (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrGlassWontBreak (talk • contribs) 13:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Rogue Sun MrGlassWontBreak (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrGlassWontBreak (talk • contribs) 13:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request assessment of Downtown Gary Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 01:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Joran Gerbet Joeykai (talk) 00:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Ryan Borucki Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Matt Nieto Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Micah Zandee-Hart Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Marie-Philip Poulin Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Ann-Renée Desbiens Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Denisa Křížová Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Erotic Probiotic 2, thank you! मल्ल (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of The Glorious Heresies, thanks!--Adelequested (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Article has been reassessed as C-Class in the meantime, which I think is appropriate Adelequested (talk) 08:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of William Henry Doyle please. Thanks, ash (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Automotive industry in Egypt, article was largely outdated, with very poor structure. I have worked on it quite a bit, mainly improving said structure as well as its encyclopedic tone, also added a bit more text. Thanks in advance!--Turnopoems (talk) 13:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Egyptian Armed Forces, I have tidied it up, structured it, updated information and added a proper history section. It was rated start-class, I feel like it deserves a higher rating now. Thanks in advance!--Turnopoems (talk) 13:22, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Trick-taking game Thanks! SJD Willoughby (talk) 01:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of House of Liars Thank you! --Adelequested (talk) 12:39, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of NW (novel) Thank you! --Adelequested (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Holy Cow (2024 film) Thank you! --Adelequested (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, assessed as c-class. i see very little information on the production and release sections. i haven't seen the film but it's highly irregular to cite anything in the plot section, and information in the lead should appear in the body (as such the lead doesn't need to be cited as it can be found in the body of the article). a recent discussion [1] decided against the use of 'universal acclaim' in describing metacritic scores and the quotes are overkill concerning copyright violations. the sources look reliable and seem to be accurately reflected in the content of the article. really nice work!!--Plifal (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Adelequested (talk) 07:47, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Brachyplatystoma Anthropophoca (talk) 04:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:05, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Alexander Campbell Cameron Joeykai (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - Joeykai, assessed as Start-class, with assessment details at article's Talk. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting re-assessment of Felix Holt, the Radical. Thank you! --Adelequested (talk) 19:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ω Awaiting Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:07, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of I Street Bridge. Thank you! NewishIdeas (talk) 06:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Assessed as B-class. The article is well-written and suitably referenced. However, there is a big gap in the history that still needs to be addressed and I am not sure if including the entire public statement is necessary. ElToAn123 (talk) 21:26, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the critique and assessment! Hopefully I have time to add to it in the future. NewishIdeas (talk) 00:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of 2024–25 Ekstraklasa. Sushidude21! (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2025
Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:03, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of March for Gaza ~ RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 10:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Mitch Keller Joeykai (talk) 05:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, Reassessed from Start to C-class. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 12:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Memphis Area Transit Authority. ElToAn123 (talk) 04:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The article is currently assessed as B-class, and while I see no major objection to that (and therefore no reason to downgrade), this page is not the correct one for a higher quality assessment. For that WP:GAN would be the place, but I would check WP:GACR carefully before. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 12:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I assessed this article despite being one of the primary contributing Wikipedians, so I was looking for an independent review. Thank you for your help! ElToAn123 (talk) 18:58, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Parasitic ants. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 19:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to B-class, good luck with the GA review! Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 11:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Visit Myanmar Year. TarheelBornBred (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, assessed as C-class. I see a lot of issues with sources formatting, like many duplicates, links to a ResearchGate entry instead of a paper itself, etc. I would encourage you to check WP:REF for best practices on this matter (alternatively WP:REFB for the simplified guide). Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 11:55, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, got it. Out of curiosity, would fixing these reference problems be enough to elevate the article higher or would further measures need to be undergone? TarheelBornBred (talk) 18:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Seekest Thou the Road. Slinora (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, kept at C-class. I see very little content in the article that is actually about the episode itself and not the series. I realize that the article about the series is quite long as it is, but I am unsure the episode has a solid claim for notability on its own and would avise to consider a merger with the parent article. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 11:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The only content within the article that is about the series is the Development section, and a paragraph of the Music section. The rest (sections: Plot, Writing, Casting, Filming, Music, Viewership, Critical response, Accolades) is all episode-specific content sourced from episode-specific coverage such as post-mortem interviews with the cast and crew, as well as episode-specific reviews from reliable publications. Still, thank you for taking the time to assess, even if I disagree with the observation. Slinora (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of 1944 Shinnston tornado. User:Yobatna (talk) 06:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, Reassessed from Start to C-class. I see several YouTube links in the refs which should be avoided, it would be good to replace them with higher quality sources. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 11:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Little Women (1933 film). Thank you, Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 22:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, Reassessed from Start to B-class, it is looking very good. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 11:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment (quality scale) of former whip of the Kuomintang Chao Tzu-chi. User:Weirongn (talk) 11:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, assessed as Start class. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 11:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment (quality scale) of former Greek footballer Giorgos Koudas. Abudabanas (talk) 09:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, Reassessed from Start to C-class. The amount of content in the article is good, but there is a severe lack of inline citations especially in the first half of the article. The lead is also quite short and clearly not neutral. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 11:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Ronald Gene Simmons Caronde (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, but from B to C-class. The "Murders" section goes in way too much detail in many instances without appropriate inline citations, and having a section called "Why?" is not encyclopedic, while also overlapping with the Motives subsection. Choucas0 🐦‍⬛⋅💬⋅📋 11:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Massagetae. Sushidude21! (talk)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 01:58, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done reassessed to B-class, very well done. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 21:10, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requests from 2025 - January to March

Requests from March 2025

Requesting an assessment of Earthquake (Jisoo song). Slinora (talk) 13:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done by @Nkon21, who assessed as C class @Slinora. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Steel guitar. User:Eagledj(talk) 17:46, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action The article has several issues: 1) Lead section is too extensive 2) Several statements have no references, where do these claims come from? 3) Two whole sections "Console steel guitars" and "Steels and slides" lack detail and any inline citations.

As I said to another user, I encourage you to improve the article and request another reassessment! NeoGaze (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of The Books of Jacob. Adelequested (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to C-class. The article has multiple issues: 1) The first reference comes from twitter, used in a way that is not acceptable 2) References 26 and 27 are broken 3) Plot and characters sections have no references 4) Parts of the article are written in a persuasive and subjective style, making use of peackock terms. These parts should be rewritten to be more neutral NeoGaze (talk) 20:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the detailed feedback! Adelequested (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of A Place of Greater Safety. Adelequested (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to C-class. For improvement the article needs more references, as well as at least two more inline citations; plot section and the supposed Sunday Express Book of the Year award. NeoGaze (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Lolly Willowes. Adelequested (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to C-class. More sources should be added if possible, and notes section should be reworked into a more standard list of sources and references. NeoGaze (talk) 20:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of Module:EUPP seats. Julius Schwarz (talk) 14:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done as this does not need to be assessed. @Julius Schwarz. I have marked it as patrolled. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Ktkvtsh. Can I remove the "Module rating is invalid or not specified" notice, then? It's a bit unsightly and, from what I understand, not applicable. Julius Schwarz (talk) 07:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say yes, though I really don't know much about Modules. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of ThinkPad G series. Dcfbf (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed as C-class. Lead paragraph could be more detailed. NeoGaze (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of Jerjuan Newton. TarheelBornBred (talk) 16:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed to C-class. Lead pharagraph could be more detailed, but so far pretty good. NeoGaze (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of The Diary of a CEO. Thank you! O2Q357Ys 15:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to B-class. Comprehensive and well-sourced. Good work! NeoGaze (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks O2Q357Ys (talk) 14:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of 1958 Rif riots. Mayouhm (talk) maybe C class now 12:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to C-class. It could be improved with the addition of pictures (if available and with no copyright issues) and "Aftermath" section could be more detailed. A citation requierement is pending there as well. NeoGaze (talk) 20:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of Józef Tkaczuk. Wikociewie (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed as Start-class. Article needs to be developed further. NeoGaze (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Education in Egypt, I have tidied it up, structured it, improved the text and added a history section Turnopoems (talk) 11:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: When I looked at it the article was rated a B -- if you want to get it up to an A-class you have to go to a specialized place for that, unfortunately -- here is only for up to B-class. I've actually rated it a C-class as there are large uncited parts, per the requirement that things likely to be challenged are cited for B-class. You can change it back if you disagree, though: to be honest, I'm not really sure how to interpret the "important or controversial material must be cited" criterion. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do think it's a nice history section, though. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Egyptian cuisine, I have significantly expanded the article, including a history section Turnopoems (talk) 11:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to C-class. There are few issues; lead text is a bit too long, several pharagraphs have no inline citations, a citation is called for in "Medieval Egypt" and "Starters and salads" has a template calling for expansion. Otherwise excellent article! NeoGaze (talk) 19:48, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Deep-sea anglerfish; current assessment: Start-class.Anthropophoca (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Anthropophoca reassessed at C-class, could use some work on references, try looking in deep sea articles and magazines as they may include an n article or report that could be used as a reference. She riff U3 18:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've found that a lot of those references tend to only mention the very basics of their biology and not much further, which is why i extensively referenced TW Pietsch's work, who is considered the expert on this clade. He's often interviewed when news agencies discuss these animals anyways. Anthropophoca (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Adi Meyerson. Surfinsi (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to B-class. Detailed and extensively sourced. Good job! NeoGaze (talk) 19:41, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of Berberism. Mayouhm (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class She riff U3 16:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of Giorgos Pantelakis. Abudabanas (talk) 10:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done: assessed it as start class. Try to expand it. Also add more citations. RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 11:01, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of Your Love (Jisoo song). Slinora (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 18:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Bondla Wildlife Sanctuary, I have significantly expanded the article, (notify me if there is any irrelevant content to be removed) User:Mitsingh (talk) 10:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I decided to lower it from B-class to C-class, and honestly it could have been demoted to Start-class. The article still needs to be significantly developed, as several parts just have two or three lines worth of text, some of which also don't have any inline citations. More references and sources, if possible, should be added as well. Don't be discouraged! NeoGaze (talk) 09:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Camp Hanuman Temple please, thx ash (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ashlar I assessed it at Start-class. Needs lots of work. She riff U3 16:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. (As explanation, the version at the time I submitted the article for reassessment was a lot longer.) ash (talk) 04:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Safe third country VeritasViolet (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed as Start-class. The article needs be developed and improved in several ways, for example; a more detailed lead section, more references, broader perspective with cases beyond Europe and the Western Sphere, etc. NeoGaze (talk) 07:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Korea University Business School. I believe that the article is no longer a stub, as I added more information and provided sources. Please be kind to reassess the article, thank you! Nuritae331 (talk) 01:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed as C-class. A few isssues I see are 1) lead text is too short, 2) a few paragraphs need more citations, such as "facilities" and the firs paragraph of "Accreditations and Rankings" an 3) a reference is repeated several times without it being named. Otherwise, jood job! NeoGaze (talk) 11:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Depauperate ecosystem as it is likely now more than a stub. Hirundinidae (talk) 20:27, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I reassessed it as C-class. It is good and well-cited, but there is still room for expansion and improvement. Good job! NeoGaze (talk) 07:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a assessment of Eish baladi Turnopoems (talk) 09:51, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done : assessed it as start class. You should try to expand it. Also add more citations. RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 18:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of 2025 Bangladesh Premier League ~ RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 09:30, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to B-class, detailed and well-referenced. The marketing section could be considered problematic, as it may be interpreted as advertising, but it seems neutral enough to me. NeoGaze (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Bangladesh national cricket team ~ RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 09:29, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action The article has several important issues, as the message boxes indicate. NeoGaze (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of In Outer Space Davejfudge (talk) 22:44, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassesed to C-class. Article still needs improvement; mainly a more detailed lead paragraph, and more as well as varied references if possible. NeoGaze (talk) 19:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Couldn't Wait to Tell You Krimzonmania7078 (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Krimzonmania7078 I assessed it a Start-class. She riff U3 22:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Flag of Hawaii Jp2207 (talk) 21:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I reassessed it as B-class. Extensive coverage and well-cited. NeoGaze (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Egypt Turnopoems (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The same as in the case below. NeoGaze (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Marking as No action Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Economy of Egypt Turnopoems (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article is already B-class, if you want to raise its quality class to either A or to GA, you need to nominate the article for review in its talk page. NeoGaze (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Marking as No action Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Military industry of Egypt Turnopoems (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class Ktkvtsh (talk) 06:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of Amstone Turnopoems (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 18:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an assessment of Robotics Engineering Systems Turnopoems (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've assessed it as a Start-class. RAIHAN ⚡ Got something to say? 18:33, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Jizzakh CentralAsianEditor (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action The article needs substantial development. There are empty sections and several paragraphs without inline citations. More sources, if possible, should be added as well. I encourage to keep working on the article and to request a new reassessment once these issues have been solved. NeoGaze (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a assessment of Ilan Uti CentralAsianEditor (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done C-class. Could use some more references, and I can't tell whether the citation at the end of the Geography section is intended to apply to all the information in the section, or just the last paragraph. With some more citations and (maybe) a little expansion on why it was strategically important, I think this would be B-class. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of Tashkent (state) CentralAsianEditor (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @CentralAsianEditor, assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a reassessment of the politician Damien Tudehope, this looks like it should be at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassesed to C-class. The article is fairly complete and (with the exception of a single citation needed) well referenced. You should probably adress that issue as soon as you can. Otherwise, there is still room for improvement, but pretty good work done so far! NeoGaze (talk) 09:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Matt King (swimmer) Joeykai (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassesed to C-class, seeing it is detailed and correctly referenced. Just a few points for future improvement; Lead paragraph should be more detailed, Some parts of the article would benefit of rewritting with better prose, and a reference lacks correct citation format (the link is just there, vulnerable to link rot). NeoGaze (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Michael Bunting Joeykai (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassesed to B-class. Detailed, comprehensive and well-sourced. Excellent! NeoGaze (talk) 18:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Yale Bulldogs women's soccer Joeykai (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed as Start-class as it needs more work. For example, lead paragraph is too short, and history section doesn't cover events beyond 2005, and has significant gaps between 1980-200. More references and sources are needed, and if possible they should be added using citation templates NeoGaze (talk) 10:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of 2024–25 Nigeria Premier Football League - Article meets requirements for start class. Jõsé^hola 10:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Josedimaria I assessed it at Start-class. She riff U3 05:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Van Zandt, Washington feedmepaperr (talk) 05:40, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class @Feedmepaperr Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reassessment of Greg Berlanti. Article has enough info to be considered higher than start-class Theadventurer64 (talk) 19:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class @Theadventurer64 Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Jewish deli after it has been an article for improvement. Yeshivish613 (talk) 00:14, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done -- B; well-cited & good coverage. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment please of Tom Thurber. (Suggest this is more than a stub now.) ash (talk) 10:17, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - @ash, remove stub; assessed as C-class article. JoeNMLC (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requests from February 2025

Request reassessment of Bobby Jones (basketball, born 1951) and Raphaël Varane. Sushidude21! (talk) 06:02, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B @Sushidude21! Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Wandering salamander. hl (talk) 04:07, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B @Heronlegs Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of George Myers (hotelier). Thanks. ash (talk) 06:26, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as Start @Ashlar Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of James Franklin (American football coach) Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C @Joeykai Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Pat McAfee Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Joeykai reassessed at B-class. She riff U3 22:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Zach Ertz Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class @Joeykai Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Kellen Moore Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Jerry Jones Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Jason Kelce Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:52, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Howie Roseman Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Marcus Spears (defensive end) Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Charvarius Ward Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done by @Hey man im josh who assessed as B class @Joeykai. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Matt Milano Joeykai (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class @Joeykai Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Harrying of the North; article says both start and B.Sushidude21! (talk) 07:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action @Sushidude21!, WikiProject Military History is in charge of their own assessments. I would request them to re-assess it on their talk page. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Eyüboğlu High School; article has had added information to its page. Theadventurer64 (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action as this is still a Start class article. @Theadventurer64. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Kamehameha Schools; article has enough sources and information to be considered higher than start class. Theadventurer64 (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Toshio Okada. The article is too detailed to be a stub. Z. Patterson (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as Start class @Z. Patterson Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of The Stuff. The article is too detailed to be a stub. Z. Patterson (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class @Z. Patterson Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Bobby Farrelly Joeykai (talk) 03:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class @Joeykai Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Jakub Dobeš Joeykai (talk) 03:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - Joeykai, assessed as C-class article. JoeNMLC (talk) 23:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of North American Hockey League Joeykai (talk) 03:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - Joeykai, assessed as Start-class article. JoeNMLC (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Scienter, as the article now cites more sources and remains Start-class as of this comment. Z. Patterson (talk) 21:27, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already done - Z. Patterson; on 17 March 2025 by @Bearian, re-assessed as B-class.
Requesting reassessment of Dama clactoniana. Too detailed to be a Stub. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action - @Anteosaurus magnificus, as this remains a Stub-class article less that 250 words prose size. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Arthur Engoron. Also needs a higher rating. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - @Anteosaurus magnificus, assessed as C-class article. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 19:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Madelaine Böhme. IMO this deserves a slightly higher rating. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action - @Anteosaurus magnificus, as this remains a Stub-class article less that 250 words prose size. JoeNMLC (talk) 18:58, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Bandung Conference. A page that has been updated well beyond Start level. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - @Anteosaurus magnificus, remaining Start-class article. Added refimprove and cn tag to indicate additional sources needed. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Jia Xiuquan Joeykai (talk) 03:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Joeykai assessed as C class Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Kimika Forbes Joeykai (talk) 03:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class @Joeykai Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Niloofar Ardalan Joeykai (talk) 03:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done reassessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Yusif Basigi Joeykai (talk) 03:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done reassessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Manja Rogan Joeykai (talk) 03:34, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - @Joeykai, assessed as Start-class article. Added DOB cite, and "Excessive cite" tag. Easily can be C/B-class once details are condensed. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 12:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Potamotherium. This is also probably one grade better than its current rating. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Assessed at C-class Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting reassessment of Diplocynodon. This is definitely far beyond a Stub now. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at Start-class Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Dama celiae. A bit too detailed of an article to be listed as a Stub, IMO. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at Start-class Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:25, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Xiaoming Wang. This page is good enough to be higher than a Stub. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done reassessed at Start-class Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Oliver & Company: This article has been cleaned up, detailed, and well-written. If possible, change it from C-Class to B-Class (if not, that's fine. It's just a test to see if it needed any additional changes before moving to B-Class.) I am still fixing on some things, and a few things do need work though. It won't be a Good Article until any of the work needed is done. We definitely need an article on the soundtrack. Aubreeprincess (talk) 09:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Aubreeprincess assessed as B class. For higher please request elsewhere. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assesment of Louisville Cardinals women's volleyball Joeykai (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Joeykai assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:03, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Chloe Ricketts Joeykai (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:05, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Spencer Martin (ice hockey) Joeykai (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:07, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Dominic Toninato Joeykai (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:08, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Alexandre Carrier Joeykai (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:09, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Ryan Poehling Joeykai (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:10, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Ethan Prow Joeykai (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Arttu Ruotsalainen Joeykai (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:12, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Jake Chelios Joeykai (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:14, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Nicolas Beaudin Joeykai (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Ryan Graves (ice hockey) Joeykai (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Urho Vaakanainen Joeykai (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:18, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Anthony Banda Joeykai (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Leah Galton Joeykai (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:22, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Frida Maanum Joeykai (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:24, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assesment of Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale Joeykai (talk) 05:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Aaron Grymes Joeykai (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of DeQuin Evans Joeykai (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Roberto Aguayo Joeykai (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:28, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Charlie Chong. Bpuddin (talk) 03:00, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 10:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassesment of Stella (album). R2D2Poland (talk) 00:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:42, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Agatha Harkness (Marvel Cinematic Universe). Slinora (talk) 19:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class @Slinora Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Brandon Hagel, currently a start-class article — Grey ^(talk) 01:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:18, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Jamal Musiala. Sushidude21! (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Gaussian units. Sushidude21! (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action as this is still a C class article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:43, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Opposition to Elon Musk's role in the US federal government Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 16:00, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by @CommunityNotesContributor who assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Response to Elon Musk's role in the US federal goverment Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 16:00, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by @CommunityNotesContributor who assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of US federal entities targeted by Elon Musk I assessed it as a C-class article but wanted someone else to take a look and see if it is B-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 07:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by @CommunityNotesContributor who assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Joey Skaggs, currently under a Start-class.VillageProper (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:05, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Domestic pigeon, currently still under Start-class.--Anthropophoca (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:04, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request re-assessment of Conrad Reeves. Believe this is now more than a stub. Cheers ash (talk) 07:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ashlar Reassessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 07:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of List of cardinals of Brazil. This was recently translated by me, it's a list. Bemloko ᴬʰᵒʸ! ᵀᵃˡᵏ ᵗᵒ ᵐᵉ 08:19, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done It is not clear why you have requested assessment of this list as it is already classified at List-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 22:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Luis M. Chiappe. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Anteosaurus magnificus The article needs more prose to it and some more about him. Other wise it looks good, might be a C-class article if the prose is added with the same level of quality as the current text. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 22:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Allen Weisselberg. Definitely much higher than a Start. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class @Anteosaurus magnificus. If another user believes it is B class, please update. There could be photos added I believe. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Anthony Fiorillo. Also probably better than a Start now. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This reads as more of a resume than encyclopedia entry to me. Where is he from? How old is he? I'm not prepared to move it past start. Would like other users input please. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Anteosaurus magnificus thanks for making updates. Re-assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:09, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Gareth J. Dyke. This has definitely been expanded beyond a Start. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I feel like the section past research is written more like an essay than an encyclopedic entry. The direct quotes make it feel more like a school research paper than an encyclopedic entry to me. I'm not comfortable moving it farther from Start at this time. Would like other users input on this. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Topps Meat Company. This article has been rated as B-class, but in its current state, I think it might need to be lowered. Just look at the opening paragraph and the Ownership and Timeline sections. Maybe it's just me, but they feel very disorganized, if you ask me. TinglesFrickinMap (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @TinglesFrickinMap, I have reassessed this as Start class. Absolutely needs some work. Thank you for bringing it up. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Roar of the Dragon. Currently rated as a stub, but might now be start-class. Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Heidi Pusey BYU, by @Sheriff U3 who assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heidi Pusey BYU I reassessed it at Start-class, but if you can add sources for one paragraph which has none then it might be a C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 01:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Sheriff U3 Do you mean the cast section? I'm not sure what paragraph is needing sources, since the lede doesn't need any (the information is addressed later). It might just be that I'm missing it as I'm scanning over the article. I just want to make sure I'm addressing the right thing. Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to the Plot section. Sorry I did not mean paragraph. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 00:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I watched the film and wrote the summary. According to this I don't need to provide a citation for the plot summary if it is available to watch, since the film itself is considered the source of the information. For example, this B-class article and this featured article do not have sources for the plot (except the FA does have footnotes that refers the reader to the prequel). Hope that helps. Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 00:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it does! I did not know films have that exception if they are available to watch. I will reassess at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 00:59, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 17:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of George Pollard Jr. Currently rated as start-class, but might now be C-class. Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Hans-Dieter Sues. Still rated as a Stub despite being much better than that. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 18:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Scott D. Sampson. Also deserves higher than a Stub rating. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 17:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Lindsay Zanno. Deserves a higher rating than Start. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 17:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of microbialite. Definitely not a Start anymore; it has been enriched far beyond that. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Anteosaurus magnificus Reassessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 17:54, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of David Montgomery Hart currently unrated Mayouhm (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Mayouhm Assessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 05:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of steppe bison. This also deserves to be a grade or two higher. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 23:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at C-class. It looks good, could use some work on WP:MOS but other wise looks like a good article. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 05:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Listriodon. Another former Stub article that now has some substance to it. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 23:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at Start-class. Sadly it is very hard for articles like this one to get above Start-class let alone C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 05:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Manidens. This definitely needs a higher rating as well. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 23:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class. Has a fair bit of information for article of it's type. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 05:33, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Sterling Nesbitt. This page definitely does not merit a Stub rating anymore. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 23:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 05:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Aït Atta since this was last rated, I expanded the history section, socio political organisation, redid the subdivisions section and introduced a law and culture section. I also added images as well as citations for previously uncited information Mayouhm (talk) 22:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at C-class. It needs an update on the lead, I already tagged it. Looks good other wise, keep at it! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 05:53, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Other than that, is there anything else than can be improved or done? Mayouhm (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly just WP:MOS stuff and adding anything else that is worthy of talking about. At this point I would look at the requirements for B-class and improve the article so that it meets them, then repost it and someone will look at it. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 20:13, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting assessment of Syracuse Utah Temple.Happyrain2121 (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Happyrain2121 Assessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 21:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Hercules Huncks after additional expansion and edit. I believe it is now B level. Reassesment Completed. Lois Hacker (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of K. Christopher Beard. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. Needs to be expanded. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 20:59, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Paul E. Olsen. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Anteosaurus magnificus, assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Jingmai O'Connor. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed to C-class. Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 20:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Arctic ground squirrel. It is definitely more than a Start now that it has multiple decently sized sections. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I reassessed at B-class, this looks good. Comprehensive and well-written, it only needs to be further aligned with the WP:MOS (e.g. expanding the lead, etc.). Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 20:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Ursus etruscus. Also no longer a Stub. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reassessed at Start-class. Could use some filling out in most of the paragraphs, but it may not be possible with it being about a extinct bear species. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 22:55, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Adcrocuta. This definitely is no longer a Stub after I and others have added some substantive content to it. --Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Anteosaurus magnificus I reassessed it at Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 22:51, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Hele-On. Looks to be much more than stub-class. Theadventurer64 (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I assessed as C-class. The article is quite comprehensive, but it does need an update (and is already tagged as such). Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 22:39, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Thelma Cabrera. I believe I've expanded it beyond a stub. Thank you! Carlp941 (talk) 20:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, it is easily Start class now, but not yet C class. I think you need to watch out for neutrality here, the article currently is very one-sided, and the Political Views section reads like something her own campaign could put out. Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 21:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! That's very fair. I'll give the political views section a run through, and then scan the article for POV language.

After that, do I post another request here or do I leave this one open? Carlp941 (talk) 22:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that depends how soon you think you are able to do it, but you could relist it, or send me a message on my talk page since we have a section about it now. Your choice! Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 22:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Hercules Huncks. I recently expanded this biography, classified as a Stub. Lois Hacker (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lois Hacker I reassessed it at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 21:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see that that article has been re- and re-assessed and is now back to Stub. I find myself confused by these rating criteria. Lois Hacker (talk) 15:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I checked, I think what happened is that @Sheriff U3 forgot to put the "C" when changing their mind from Start to C-class, resulting in @TAnthony filling in the blank value to match the other assessment parameter in the banner. Since it is at least clearly not a stub anymore, I filled in Start-class in both fields. Hope that helps. Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 15:29, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That explains the changes. Altho I still find the criteria opaque. Lois Hacker (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I did not know that happened. Will double check in future, thanks @Choucas Bleu for catching that. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 22:18, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I expanded it further. I don't think the material will stretch for much more. Lois Hacker (talk) 23:16, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of XVALA after a major update. Thanks! -- edi(talk) 04:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The article is currently C-class, but has definitely not the attributes of a B-class article. Even with a quick look, I see obvious MOS violations (citations in the lead), non neutral language in the lead ("infamous"), missing punctuation, subpar sources... Sorry, but I think it definitely needs more work. Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 22:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, after reading the entire article, I find the abundance of non-notable stuff and heavy promotional tone could almost warrant a demotion to Start-class, with a recommendation for very heavy trimming... I am not going to do it myself, but I would like someone else to look at it. Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 22:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at and agree that the article has major issues, I will demote to Start-class and mention the issues on the talk page. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 22:34, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment for Ailuk Atoll to see if I'm headed the right way with my organization while extending the entry from a stub class level of detail. Cmholm (talk) 23:28, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I assessed it at Start-class, needs the paragraphs to be filled out more. What do you mean by your "organization"? Due to your years of experience I assume that you mean how you go through articles, but I need clarification. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:53, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment for Black Market firebombing please. Thank you for all you guys do! Ssafder (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Cat's Paw (brand). Created the page recently after days of research! thank you in advance. Sonovawolf (talk) 08:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Sonovawolf I assessed it at Start-class. It is very close to C-class, fill out some of the paragraphs, and add more content. Then if you do as good a job on that has you have with the article currently, then I would have no issue with promoting it to C-class. Keep it up! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 11:52, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Arab tribes of Algeria This is currently unrated. thank you Mayouhm (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Mayouhm I have assessed it at C-class due how well it is sourced. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 18:29, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of 1916 California's 10th congressional district special election, dont believe its a stub anymore. Thanks! NewishIdeas (talk) 22:45, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @NewishIdeas I assessed it at C-class due to how well it is sourced and linked. It does need more prose though. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 23:56, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Maghrebi Arabs not a stub. thank you Mayouhm (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Mayouhm I reassessed it at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 20:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Assistance for airline passengers with disabilities major changes to the page from stub-class status. does not fit current rating. Tri nitrobrick 10:39, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Trinitrobrick Reassessed at C-class, it needs to have more in some of the paragraphs, but other wise looks good Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 05:21, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Jalen Kitna Joeykai (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Joeykai, assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Oulad Delim not a stub Mayouhm (talk) 12:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Mayouhm You are right! I assessed it as a C-class Article. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 05:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Court of Gold. Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already done Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Saad Warsama Dirie Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already done Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of 2010–11 Lehigh Mountain Hawks men's basketball team. Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as stub. Absolutely needs work @Sushidude21! Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Slickwater. Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as Start class @Sushidude21! though it absolutely needs added context, among other issues. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Ben Issa Ousseni. Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - Sushidude21!, assessed as Stub-class article. JoeNMLC (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Amish in Canada. Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done by @JoeNMLC who assessed as Start calss @Sushidude21!. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Guimond de Moulins. Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done - Sushidude21! - assessed as Stub-class article for now, less than 250 prose words. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Davy-Faraday Laboratory. Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting reassessment of Gaussian units. Sushidude21! (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushidude21! (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No action as this is still a C class article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requests from January 2025

Requesting assessment of Newton, Surrey. Currently a start-class article but I have made a fair amount of updates and added citations where missing. IngeniousPachyderm (talk) 17:34, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of 2012 Bacha Khan International Airport attack. start-class article. substantial updates made so far. Tahir Pro (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of St. Joseph School (Hilo, Hawaii) and Waiakea High School. Waiakea High's article has been updated, and SJS's was merged from another article, so it is no longer a stub. Thank you! Theadventurer64 (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Evolutionary economics. The article has witnessed a revamp in recent years, I would be grateful if one could have a look at what it is now and provide some ideas for further development. Econ angoryushev (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class. Anything higher will need to be requested elsewhere. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Willie McLean (soccer, born 1904) Joeykai (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done @Joeykai leaving at Start class. There is a good bit of this left unsourced. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment of Whittier Mansion. It was a stub when I began, and I have made significant updates. I'd like to understand where it stands, and what could help further improve it. Thank you!

Delectopierre (talk) 20:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already done, kept at c class. would recommend checking wp:mos to clarify prose. article structure would be better sorted into broader "history", "location", "design/architecture" sections. is there more information about the hauntings that make it lead-worthy? source 2 leads to an error page and i placed a few citation needed tags to improve. nice work so far!--Plifal (talk) 04:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of St Martin's, Isles of Scilly from start to C-Class following recent updates and improvements. Thankyou for your time and consideration to this request. 82.38.214.91 (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I have reassessed at C-class. Looks good! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 00:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment for Platon Rozhdestvensky. This is the longest article I've written and am simply looking for feedback on it. Thank you in advance!Alexthegod5 (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Alexthegod5 I have assessed as a C-class Article. It is well sourced and has plenty of links to other articles. Good Job! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 00:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment for Grevillea exul. I have expanded upon this page with numerous scientific papers and online resources, as well as information from a book I have specifically on the genus. I believe the page deserves at the very least a C-class rating, as it is no longer a stub. Thank you. Lord.of.the.Proterozoic (talk) 04:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lord.of.the.Proterozoic I have reassessed it as a C-class article. It is fairly well written for a plant, as I have noticed those hardly ever make it above Start-class. Good Work! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 07:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I will keep up what I'm doing with creating and improving articles for Grevillea and Hakea species. Lord.of.the.Proterozoic (talk) 09:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment for 1906 California gubernatorial election and 1902 California gubernatorial election. Articles have been expanded upon alot by myself and others. Thank you! NewishIdeas (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done NewishIdeas I have reassessed the article as a C-class article. It looks nice! Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment for Mardakan. I've been updating and adding information to the article for a very long time. I believe it should not be classified as a Start-class article anymore. Please be kind to reassess it again. Thank you very much! Nuritae331 (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Nuritae331 I have reassessed the article at C-class. One thing I noticed is that in the section titled Etymology there was no reference cited for most of the paragraph. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 20:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment for 1910 California gubernatorial election. Currently rated stub class, but has been expanded upon alot. Thank you! NewishIdeas (talk) 00:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment for Music of Gunbuster. For Music of Gunbuster, this was because Areaseven siginificantly expanded on it in 2023 and 2024. I do not believe the Stub-Class designation is correct for an article of that length. Z. Patterson (talk) 03:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at Start-class. I don't think it qualifies for C-class yet, but it is definitely at least Start-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment for Emily Patricia Gibson. It was a stub article, but I have expanded on it significantly. Thank you! Chefcat29 (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2025
Assessed by Schwede66 they gave it a C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment for Third medium contact method. The article now covers all developments of the third medium contact method, including the most recent ones from 2025, a description of the basic approach (without too much technical detail), brief sections on its applications, and it is well-cited. I would appreciate it if other editors could review the article and provide their feedback on this request.AHFrederiksen (talk) 12:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at C-class. It looks fairly good, it may qualify for a B-class, but a more experienced reviewer should look at it. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting an assessment for the Pete Ondeng article. I have been working on it to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's BLP policy. Feedback is needed on:

Reliability of sources used.
Neutrality in tone—does it seem promotional?
Contentious or poorly sourced material.

Your assistance in reviewing or improving the article is greatly appreciated! Emily Emiliene k (talk)

Done Assessed at C-class. It is very good, reference 11. needs to be fixed though. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment for Sogang University. I've provided generous information as well as sources since it's last assessment, please be kind to reassess it again, thank you! Nuritae331 (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I assessed it at C-class but it maybe a B-class, a more experienced editor will need to look at it. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment for Cope Notes, which did not receive a rating after NPP review. 30Four (talk) 06:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Assessed at start class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting assessment for Bridge Fire. Never re-assessed since start rating. Arcturus95 (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Done: Gave it a B, very well-written article with great sources. Mamani1990 (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting for assessment of Bawi system. Recently made and need input on its current status. Thanks :) Mmis325 (talk) 04:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Graded by Ipigott. They have given it a B. / RemoveRedSky ^[talk] 18:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting for (re)assessment of Taguig. Made some significant edits, and I would like to know what still needs to be improved so I can work on it. Thank you! PH 0447 (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done assessed as B class. Anything higher will need to be requested elsewhere. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting reassessment of Louis René Barrera Indiangrass Wildlife Sanctuary. Thank you in advance! LIUCWisshorn24 (talk)
Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Francis Francis please. (I don't think this is a stub anymore.) Thanks ash (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Upgraded to Start Class by Vanderwaalforces. / RemoveRedSky ^[talk] 18:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request reassessment of Next, Hello! I don't think this is a stub anymore and kindly request reassessment please. Thank you in advance, Mamani1990 (talk) 19:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done I assessed it at C-class. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 06:27, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment log

Wikipedia articles:
Index · Statistics · Log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

May 10, 2025

Assessed

Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

Draft:Runiversalis (talk) removed.
Draft:Wikipedia Garfield gender debate (talk) removed.

May 9, 2025

Assessed

Draft:Ravi Puli (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

May 5, 2025

Removed

Draft:Image Group International (talk) removed.
Draft:World Federal Government (talk) removed.

May 4, 2025

Removed

Draft:Josiah Dunbar (talk) removed.

^ Prose at the Good Article level is not expected to be at a professional level like it is for Featured Articles. Minor grammatical or style issues that do not impact clarity are not prohibitive of GA status.

[1] Prose at the Good Article level is not expected to be at a professional level like it is for Featured Articles. Minor grammatical or style issues that do not impact clarity are not prohibitive of GA status.

Conheça Walt Disney World

Subpages

Frequently asked questions

Instructions

Quality assessments

Importance assessment

Assessment requests

Requests from 2025

Requests from May 2025

Requests from April 2025

Requests from March 2025

Requests from February 2025

Requests from January 2025

Assessment log

May 10, 2025

Assessed

Removed

May 9, 2025

Assessed

May 5, 2025

Removed

May 4, 2025

Removed