Pular para o conteúdo

Conheça Walt Disney World

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2009 Archive Mar 1


Can someone check out these contributions?

Ilana81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam) seems to do nothing but add links to a specific website. I'm not terribly familiar with the topics he or she frequents (and they're political hot buttons) but the pattern(s) of his or her behavior make my spidey sense tingle. Can someone else glance at his or her contributions? --ElKevbo (talk) 05:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

There's a definite COI vs NPOV potential. Basically, what this person is doing is adding links to a pro-Israel thinktank to every article she can think of that has to do with Israel or conflict in that part of the Middle East. See their mission statement. She is about to blunder straight into Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Remedies. --Dynaflow babble 05:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
User has now been warned about both spamming and the ArbCom decision. See: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Can someone sysoppy sign off on an Israel-Palestine ArbCom notification? (diff). --Dynaflow babble 22:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

edufire.com

Several of us have been spending time over the last week or reverting edits to multiple education-related articles by one or more editors who keep adding links to www.edufire.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com . It's clearly inappropriate and the editor(s) involved refuse to discuss the issue. I recommend adding this website to the blacklist or blocking editors; my colleagues and I are tired of policing this blatant spam. --ElKevbo (talk) 22:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.angstromadvanced.com http://spam.angstrom-advanced.com

Spammers

MER-C 06:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

renewable-energy-future.com

Links
Accounts

Linkspamming, COI, and edit warring (including 3RR). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, another COI link added by the above named user:
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment: Azxten (talk · contribs) attempted to blank this report [1]. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Google Adsense ID: 0255064799905576
Also spammed:
Related Eguza Media domains:
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
A new user just registered and spammed eye-twitch.org:
 Defer to Local blacklist: all 8 domains are now blacklisted. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 20:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

http://www.saabhistory.com

saabhistory.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Diffs: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Spammers

swaq 17:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

allsup.com

Links
Accounts

--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Also, Adrealtor (talk · contribs) attempted to delete it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Adrealtor (talk · contribs) tried to delete it again. Matt (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

All links have been removed. Why isn't this content removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrealtor (talk • contribs) 21:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

There will be no links added as these were not spam links in the true sense of the word they were related to the content area. I did not understand the specifics of the spam policy. I do now and would appreciate a removal as there was only 5 or 6 links to begin with. It was not a mass posting or anything like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrealtor (talk • contribs) 21:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

The links have been removed already. Themfromspace (talk) 21:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

What needs to be done to remove this content? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrealtor (talk • contribs) 21:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

This doesnt belong in the spam list because it was not spam, it was a relevant post but a misunderstanding of policy. How should I remove this content from the page appropriately. Adrealtor (talk) 21:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Now my comments are being deleted as well Adrealtor (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

It is not your place as the original subject of this report to be removing it or any information connected to it from this page. The report will be kept for historical purposes whatever the outcome of the report is. Remember that either way it is in the page history so trying to remove it will serve no real purpose. It will be archived in due course. It is worth noting that attempts to remove a spam report by the subject do not look good for obvious reasons. If you have not been blocked for spamming at this point and no action has been taken then you would be well advised to just forget about this report and not create problems by edit warring, breaking 3RR or being accused of vandalism over its removal. Mfield (talk) 22:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Multiple attemps to delete report[2][3][4]. Additionaly seems to also add
--Hu12 (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

hashsum.com

-Themfromspace (talk) 08:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.smubla.com

Adsense pub-1411367161847985

smubla.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

Photo sharing site, links spammed are not quite limited to one user (Samuel Raj). MER-C 12:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Airis ATM Technologies Spam

Accounts

Airisatm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
--Hu12 (talk) 17:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Spamming of multiple recordings of classical pieces all to their download site.

See for example

  1. Symphony for Organ No. 5 (Widor)#Audio clips (permalink) which contains 7 audio recordings of the piece -- all classicalshop download site sources. DIFF.
  2. Ditto at Royal Air Force College Cranwell#Audio clips with 3 links. DIFF.
  3. Their other links (Special:Linksearch results) -- often multiple links from a given page.

FT2 (Talk | email) 20:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I think the removal of these links was appropriate. Themfromspace (talk) 05:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

drylife.co.uk bigbabyfun.com

drylife.co.uk: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

bigbabyfun.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammer

82.23.89.88 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Repeated posting of stores in several articles from single purpose IP. Siawase (talk) 13:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

geminimanagementnv.com

geminimanagementnv.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Can someone have an objective look at the contributions of Special:Contributions/Raymond_Gorissen. This person is placing link to his company's website at various articles. He is spamming, but are these links inappropriate? See also m:User:COIBot/XWiki/geminimanagementnv.com on meta. Thanks! EdBever (talk) 18:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

destination360.com

Links
Accounts
Prior report

This appears to be a long-standing issue, with COI edits dating back over the last few years. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Six sigma

User:VCJv has made One, two, three edits to Six sigma, all reverted so far. I guess he may keep trying until he gets bored.

Spammer

Nelson50T

Timestamp. MER-C 12:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.bulldozercat.com

bulldozercat.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 08:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Still spamming. MER-C 12:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

spam.alovize.com

Spam pages
Sites spammed

alovize.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers
  • Spammed on Turkish Wikipedia, see tr:Special:Contributions/88.235.168.207.

MER-C 10:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Blacklisted globally on meta, see m:User:COIBot/XWiki/alovize.com. EdBever (talk) 19:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

spam.nurseryclass.com

nurseryclass.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers
  • Citation spammer, see [5]/[6].
  • Citation spammer, see [7].
  • Citation spammer, see [8].
  • Spammed on Spanish Wikipedia, see es:Special:Contributions/Nursery1234.
  • Citation spammer, see [9].

 Defer to Local blacklist MER-C 12:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

themapicus.com

Sites spammed

Looks very, very suspicious. I don't have time to investigate and cleanup right now. --Ronz (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Accounts
Every account that I've found so far that has added this link has been used for the sole purpose of adding the link, and all of it within the last month. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Note: I also viewed the source for several of the links added. The site does not host any content itself, it's a front-end viewer for flickr.com content. The site is also loaded with ad-revenue links such as google adsense and widgetbucks.com. These appear to be clear and blatant spam to me. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Two more SPA added links today:
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I've submitted the link to WP:SBL#themapicus.com due to the continued disruptive editing of adding the spam link. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
It's been added--Hu12 (talk) 20:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Bully stick

Per a blog comment on this page reading But a link can drive much traffic as our client BestBullySticks.com can attest. They have a image on the bully sticks page of Wikipedia with a reference link to their site. I went to the Bully Stick page and removed the spam. A few IPs reverted me until the page was semi-protected, in which out of the blue a single purpose user name reinserted the link again. Might need someone else to give them a clue that their spam isn't wanted. Themfromspace (talk) 08:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

As silly as this may sound, I do need backup here as one of the users has just reverted again and has threatened to "report me". I don't want to raise an edit war so anybody who wants to give him a clue is welcome. Themfromspace (talk) 18:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Editor is blocked for edit-warring. He's a SPA whose only edits to date are to promote his website. --Ronz (talk) 20:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Accounts
Avrumelmakis1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Gibbywmu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
71.127.130.248 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
98.140.14.197 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
209.155.255.35 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
24.125.172.75 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
24.125.83.66 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
71.246.145.97 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
72.82.56.13 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
98.140.14.63 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
Long term spam and abuse, Both links are now Blacklisted--Hu12 (talk) 20:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Iowa Network http://spam.theiowa.net

theiowa.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Sites spammed

http://spam.hymntime.com

Related domains

http://spam.ac5wg.com

http://spam.acefrye.com

http://spam.actionhandyman.net

http://spam.arkansaspolicelaw.com

http://spam.atf-davidson.net

http://spam.atfdavidson.net

http://spam.atfdavidson.com

http://spam.birkfamily.net

http://spam.brangoccio.com

http://spam.brightdirection.com

http://spam.cafearabesque.com

http://spam.californiapolicelaw.com

http://spam.capitolcitygraphicsinc.com

http://spam.cierzan.com

http://spam.cox-design.com

http://spam.dbmptech.com

http://spam.dominionglory.com

http://spam.e-bankcard.net

http://spam.e-voiceproductions.com

http://spam.elbeurope.org

http://spam.ellesgroup.com

http://spam.ericksongallery.com

http://spam.ericsongallery.com

http://spam.firstcallconstruction.com

http://spam.floridaspolicelaw.com

http://spam.iowacorn.org

http://spam.frankstrong.com

http://spam.friendsville.net

http://spam.frye-associates.com

http://spam.fryemarketing.com

http://spam.fryemedia.com

http://spam.ftrmotorsports.net

http://spam.ftrmotorsports.com

http://spam.ghoen.com

http://spam.gleh.net

http://spam.gpaulfrye.com

http://spam.gpfrye.com

http://spam.halldesignassoc.com

http://spam.hdadesign.com

http://spam.heartlandia.com

http://spam.herbdixon.net

http://spam.illinoispolicelaw.com

http://spam.iowa-circulation.com

http://spam.iowa-mail.net

http://spam.iowaautodamage.com

http://spam.iowababies.com

http://spam.iowalandlord.org

http://spam.iowaprayerbreakfast.com

http://spam.iowaspolicelaw.com

http://spam.ir-c.com

http://spam.jgloyer.com

http://spam.joanbirkdesigns.com

http://spam.jpfrye.com

http://spam.ka0vsl.com

http://spam.kambafamily.com

http://spam.kanefamilyonline.com

http://spam.kenkrogman.com

http://spam.legalsciences.com

http://spam.lindysgraphics.net

http://spam.lymanfamily.net

http://spam.macdonaldletter.com

http://spam.mcdonaldletter.com

http://spam.merlehaymall.com

http://spam.minnesotaspolicelaw.com

http://spam.missourispolicelaw.com

http://spam.moldguys.com

http://spam.mossholder.net

http://spam.nationalballoonmuseum.com

http://spam.nebraskaspolicelaw.com

http://spam.newdirectionsinc.com

http://spam.newyorkspolicelaw.com

http://spam.niteowlprinting.com

http://spam.northdakotaspolicelaw.com

http://spam.offsetart.com

http://spam.ohiospolicelaw.com

http://spam.nr0x.com

http://spam.offsetart.com

http://spam.ohiospolicelaw.com

http://spam.onocologyassociatesinc.com

http://spam.onpax.com

http://spam.onpaxed.com

http://spam.open-i-online.com

http://spam.papercollect.com

http://spam.patch4schools.com

http://spam.pennsylvaniaspolicelaw.com

http://spam.policelegalsciences.com

http://spam.rrsongs.com

http://spam.slightlyoff.com

http://spam.sollenbarger.com

http://spam.southdakotaspolicelaw.com

http://spam.stamchocolate.com

http://spam.stevevanoort.com

http://spam.stoneseven.com

http://spam.stuit.net

http://spam.teamburkart.com

http://spam.tebranstad.com

http://spam.thetownsquare.com

http://spam.timberbrookarts.com

http://spam.timberbrookarts.net

http://spam.timberbrookarts.org

http://spam.tovrea.com

http://spam.traderclone.com

http://spam.vacancy4rent.com

http://spam.vacancy4rent.net

http://spam.we-r-handy.com

http://spam.whislers.net

http://spam.ziino.net

Spammers

See also User talk:EdBever#Cyber Hymnal. MER-C 09:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Yea, I've been monitoring the addition of the hymntime links although I've been reluctant to remove them as the few I spot-checked seemed to be appropriate. The mass-addition should stop though, especially if it's SEO related. Nice catch on all the others. Themfromspace (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Apple Freebies

apple.freebiejeebies.co.uk: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

This is a refferral-system for which wikipedia is abused. See Special:Contributions/Wombletim. EdBever (talk) 13:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

cultreviews.com

rocheviolins.com

User

81.151.227.156 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Links

rocheviolins.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Katr67 (talk) 22:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I cleaned these up. There were a few more IPs. Katr67 (talk) 08:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Recipes

I'm not sure this is the correct page to report this, but over the last couple of months, I've noticed a vandal persistently creating new accounts and adding recipe spam to random articles. Here are three diffs that occurred today:

--Bagatelle (talk) 03:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

From ANI:

Looking at Olegshaldybin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), I'm wondering if this is an attempt to publish recipes from cookeatshare.com. --Ronz (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.preventinfertility.info

Adsensepub-3662733476962109

Accounts

121.243.182.207 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
122.167.40.53 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
--Hu12 (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

New categories for spammer talk pages

As of today, when new spam, advertising or coi warning templates are placed on spammers' talk pages, the template when substituted will automatically add the page to the appropriate new category below:

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 05:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

WOW. Someones been busy! Great work!!--Hu12 (talk) 17:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Much appreciated! Themfromspace (talk) 09:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

earthpano.com

Link
Accounts

Multiple IP and SPA account that have all been adding the same non-notable panoramic site to multiple articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

An additional user in the same IP range added a link today:
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

counter-tenor dot net

Site

Accounts

-Themfromspace (talk) 09:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

bigbabyfun.com and drylife.co.uk

-Themfromspace (talk) 11:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

safehookup.com (NSFW)

-Themfromspace (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I was shocked to discover a direct link to file download of a .ZIP file embedded as a reference in an article. It presented itself as a free download of an old version of some software. I of course removed it, but talk about something that could be major copyright violation or a way for scammers to distribute malware. Considering that we are not a web directory, can we get the spam block app to remove links to URLs ending in .ZIP, .EXE or anything else of that nature? And if there's some other place to report this, let me know, because this seems like a really important thing to get accomplished. DreamGuy (talk) 13:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

In perl, something like '\.zip$' would block everything ending in .zip. Not sure what the 'end of line' modifier is for php. Guess this could be blacklisted, otherwise at least on xlinkbot here. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, had a short chat with Lustiger Seth. '\.zip\z' would be better. He was however not sure if it really would help, because the really bad stuff is named like 'example.org/funny_bunny.html' (surprise downloads .. ). But it may help a bit. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

New template: {{LinkSummaryLive}}

I've created a variant of {{LinkSummary}} that automatically adds a live link to the domain of concern at the end of the domain information:

compare with LinkSummary "classic":

Neither template should be substituted ("subst"). --A. B. (talk • contribs) 14:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

In a way handy, makes tracking easier, but ... this might result in pages not wanting to save when archived, just as with the current live links .. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
That's why I created a second template -- if you think a site's likely to be blacklisted, just use {{LinkSummary}}. To get rid of live links after the fact, just cut the "Live" out of the template. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
It looks like there's an extra pipe at the end of the "live" url, that is currently preventing it from working. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I think I fixed this, but a template-savvy person might want to look over my work. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I have adapted COIBot to pick this one up. You're right A., and it may be certainly be handy.
I was thinking. If the link here would be spam.example.org/spam, and we whitelist '\bspam\..*?\/spam\b', then we could blacklist what we want ... --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Presently, the template uses ".sss" just after the "http://". Should we use something else? (I'm reluctant to use "spam" since that has a pejorative connotation). --A. B. (talk • contribs) 16:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I think the whitelisting would be more helpful if we 'wrap' it in something. 'sss' Is fine, one could consider to put that at the end as well, and write an appropriate whitelist rule (one that can only minimally be abused). --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm doubtful of the benefits of whitelisting in this way. I suspect it wouldn't take long for a spammer to figure it out, and to create a "sss." page that forwards to the main page of their site. We can always try it, and just be prepared to remove it later if/when it does get abused as a bypass around the blacklist. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
What that regards, it is better to use 'spam' .. I wonder if they would really like to be linked as http://spam.mylink.somewhere/spam (if we use end and beginning of line markers, that is the ONLY way they can use the link then, i.e. the regex ^spam\..*?\/spam\z!). We could put it in a mix of hexadecimal and octadecimal code, so it does not read as spam when read. Also, the link does not have to be visible, make it mylink.somewhere and the spam is hidden. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
That should be a good way to deal with it - it would be pretty obvious when viewing external links if anyone is abusing the whitelisting. As an extra safety measure, it would be convenient to find a search that could spot the use of links wrapped in that text in the article namespace. Any suggestions on a query that could accomplish that? I've tried a few possibilities, but can't locate one that would be useful for this. I would still say we should go ahead and implement, even without a query - although a query would be nice to have available. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi!
I don't think, all this is a good idea. It's somehow sophisticated/obfuscated and a misuse of both the sbl and the wikipedia functions.
However, I guess, the majority doesn't mind (just like the last times when I said, that this strange workaround spam.example.org should be omitted) ...
So let me first give you technical support. After that I'll give an example to show why I don't think those tricky things will help us.
We can't use ^ for BOL withing the sbl, see extension manual (or source code). This could be worked around by using zero-width positve look-behind assertions, i.e., use (?<=://) instead of ^.
Apart from that it's not necessary to use non-greedy .*?, just use .*
Thus the whole entry could be
<(?<=://)spam\..*/spam\z
That's compatible with php's PCRE and perl, btw.
So this would be a valid entry. But still it would be easy for bad guys to misuse that "feature", e.g. http://spam.on.nimp.org/spam (DON'T GO TO THAT PAGE! it could crash your browser).
-- seth (talk) 23:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Accounts

Kytheraki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
--Hu12 (talk) 19:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

COI Citation spam

Vink, Dennis Nyenrode Business University [10]

Accounts

Dvink (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
Adds links to his own work--Hu12 (talk) 19:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

iamstrong.org

Accounts

Humanbrain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
--Hu12 (talk) 19:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

COI Spamming of Matt Keegan articles

Accounts

MattKeegan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
User only edits to link to work which he created and continues (longterm) to use wikipedia to promote his work.--Hu12 (talk) 20:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paint_It_Black_(band)

in the backround information a user named Onionarisen keeps edditing it to enter spam messages to users on the gamefaqs site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.134.99.90 (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

powerhour(mixes|dvd|game).com

Account

75.151.228.217 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

User has been spamming powerhourmixes.com, powerhourdvd.com, and powerhourgame.com in the entry for Power Hour. 204.52.215.6 (talk) 20:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Links
Added {{LinkSummary}} for easier reference. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Note: This appears to be an on-going edit war to add commercial linkspam. Various IPs and SPA accounts have been re-inserting the spam and game-guide content for at least the past year. Explaination of the removal of the content has been on the talk page, with no replies from any of the accounts that are re-inserting the links and disputed content. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Additional link added by same IP:
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

meetinnovators.com

attractcapital.com

Looks suspicious, but don't have the time to follow up. --Ronz (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

COI spamming of references

Accounts

Medianyc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
SPA is solely adding borderline reference links from this publication. Not sure if this is straight up spamming, but its definitely not 100% kosher. Username suggests COI. ccwaters (talk) 01:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

newyorktimesbestsellerlist.org

ELs and references to blog. Mfield (talk) 23:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
    • despite the title, this is actually a blog about best selling books, and why the nyt lets them use their name for it is beyond me. In general of course we shouldn't use it. But it is conceivable that there might on occassion be an actual author interview there that would be usable, so I wouldn't blacklist. DGG (talk) 04:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
The only author interviews I've seen there have been copyright violations of other sites, and thus totally unusable. DreamGuy (talk) 02:54, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Which ones and where from? That would be interesting, and would make blacklisting the whole lot easier. Mfield (talk) 03:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
One I saw was "interview with Larry King" and copied transcript of Larry King's CNN program interview without permission. I think one was a copy of a Salon article as well, and placed into an artile in place of an existing link to the actual Salon article. I've been through so many now I don't know which was which. Since I'm removing these by hand I'll look at others as I get to them and report back. DreamGuy (talk) 04:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I think they all are copyright violations. These are the first ones I checked today:

The whole site is a massive attempt to scam people into thinking it's an official NYT site with blatantly stolen content with ads served up left and right and linkfarmed to Wikipedia. DreamGuy (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


Same accounts spamming this site is also spamming automatedebook.net DreamGuy (talk) 03:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I've now deleted all links to this site (was on some 65 pages, sometimes with multiple links per site hidden as refs) per hand except for the three mentioned above. I will go through and get those in a few days. Not sure what good listing something here is if I have to delete it all myself anyway. DreamGuy (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

The existing ones always have to removed manually. I have filled a BOT request User_talk:XLinkBot/RevertList#newyorktimesbestsellerlist.org to catch future additions. Mfield (talk) 23:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.axebet.com

axebet.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers
  • Cross-wiki spammer, see ru:Special:Contributions/94.27.110.242.

MER-C 11:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Requested blacklisting [26] --Dferg (w:en: - w:es:) 19:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I just started a discussion on the Village Pump about an external links noticeboard and I'm inviting feedback from those of you here that are involved with external links on Wikipedia. Themfromspace (talk) 14:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

houseloanmodifications.com

houseloanmodifications.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

71.105.18.66 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

174.42.204.128 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

98.133.77.124 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)


Flowanda | Talk 20:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.groodo.com

Adsense pub-0721625504498861

groodo.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 12:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Updated. MER-C 12:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Metropolitan museum of art

Stradfan's contributions show that he is out to promote the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the field of music, but I haven't reverted him because some of his (dozens and dozens) of links appear to be valid. Would somebody else look over this guy to make sure this is legit? Thanks, Themfromspace (talk) 11:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Adsense pub-2149132956849100

Sites spammed

http://spam.pakplay.com

http://spam.gsmspice.com

http://spam.songs5.com

Related domains

http://spam.folsol.com

http://spam.thehindimusic.com

http://spam.sms4impress.com

http://spam.shayarinsms.com

http://spam.songsmastee.com

Spammers

MER-C 12:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.ice-vajal.com

ice-vajal.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 12:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Various domains apparently associated with whypark.com

  1. vip.asia: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
  2. articleiq.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
  3. tours.asia: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
  4. refinance.mobi: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

...all of which share the same template and overall format, and have their DNS hosted by whypark.com, who appear to be a provider of "domain development" services. All of them seem to be hosted at the same IP address, 98.129.126.138. I've removed all the instances of links to the above I can find.

Spam accounts:

  1. 217.42.20.64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot) (diff) (diff) (diff)
  2. 217.169.54.253 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot) (diff) (diff) (diff) (diff)

...both of which are persistent slow-motion link spammers, with habits of making very similar edits to talk pages. Both have been now blocked for 3 months.

Is there a way of blocking whole categories of URLs leading to autogenerated pages like this, based on their common DNS or IP hosting arrangements?

-- Karada (talk) 12:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Not without massive collateral damage. Quatloo (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Zenithpress

User account has added references to over 20 books published by Zenith Press. Newguy34 (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

User account has since been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because username does not meet username policy. Newguy34 (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

taxworry.com

Ad-heavy site that probably never meets WP:EL. Looks like others have noticed this and warned editors like TaxQuery, but ip's have continued the spamming.
I don't have time to follow up. Help appreciated. --Ronz (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Got the set that was there when I checked. DreamGuy (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! No other editors or ips involved? --Ronz (talk) 15:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't look to see who added them, I just killed them off. Wasn't a huge pile, though, so I don't think it was too widespread. DreamGuy (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Virtual Collection of Masterpieces http://spam.masterpieces.asemus.museum

Spam pages
Sites spammed
Accounts

It looks like a good source of images for Commons but the pile of SPAs and the methodology is concerning. MER-C 09:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

The site requires Microsoft SIlverlight to view the images, and as such is completely useless to a large number of Wikipedia users. It therefore fails WP:EL criteria and should not be linked to anywhere except on the main article about it (which would be nice if it had some third party sources for information outside of itself instead of just being a brochure). I'll go around removing some links based upon how much time I have and how many there are. DreamGuy (talk) 17:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Updated. It's also rather annoying to see that the suggested replacement for the copyvio article (which was reinstated) is another copyvio. Sigh. Time to start handing out {{spam4im}}s. MER-C 08:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Antratel Pty Ltd

Adsense pub-2564752536730595

antratel.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spam pages
Sites spammed

http://spam.weatherpage.com.au

http://spam.weatherpage.co.nz

http://spam.russianworld.com.au

http://spam.tripleme.com

Related domains

http://spam.onlybest.com.au

Spammers

MER-C 11:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

ncwpics.com

Links
Accounts
Prior reports of link

Ongoing linkspamming that has been repeatedly re-inserted by same user, and removed by multiple editors. User has received warnings in September 2008, October 2008, and March 2009. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

One of the IPs again added the link today without discussion, despite prior warnings. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

pastthepages.ca

This spa has been doing nothing but promote this website for about a year. ThemFromSpace 19:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

equilar.com

Link
Accounts

Single purpose account, spamming link to multiple articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

The link continues to be added by the SPA account Ericjstudios (talk · contribs). I've removed the blatant advert wording of each addition, and removed it from company articles - but I have for now left the core data on the articles about the CEOs themselves. However, I think someone else should review these to see if that's appropriate, or if they entries should be removed completely. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
The SPA account ontinues to spam the link, using the same promotional text with each addition of the link. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Note: The user has also begun removing competing sites that mention comparable statistics while inserting his link, such as in the edit here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

cipplanner.com

Link
Accounts

User spamming site to multiple articles. The user has already been blocked for exceeding four warnings - reported here for tracking purposes. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Another account:
An IP has also been spamming the link to multiple articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

wise-pages.com

Links
Accounts

Spamming and link hijacking to insert link. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

User:MattKeegan

Per WP:COIN incident, this user has been spamming essays hosted under these domains into various articles. -- samj inout 22:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.smubla.com

Adsense pub-1411367161847985

Previous incidents
Sites spammed

smubla.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 11:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.eastcoastaudios.in

Spam pages
Sites spammed

eastcoastaudios.in: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 11:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.irinnews.org

irinnews.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Accounts

Normally I'd just revert + spam2, but this site belongs to the United Nations. Editing pattern is very suspicious. MER-C 11:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.autoworld.com.my http://spam.jobstreet.com

Spam pages
Sites spammed
Spammers

MER-C 12:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.lawtv.com

lawtv.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Sites spammed

http://spam.lawschool.com

http://spam.lawschool100.com

http://spam.patentbarexam.biz

http://spam.freempre.com

Related domains

http://spam.illinoisbarreview.com

http://spam.lawschool250.com

http://spam.lawcentral.com

http://spam.chesslaw.com

http://spam.legalworld.com

http://spam.enpassant.com

http://spam.ruleoflaw.com

http://spam.willcentral.com

http://spam.legaled.com

http://spam.supremecourt.org

http://spam.nationallawyer.com

http://spam.newsmonth.com

http://spam.lawdictionary.com

http://spam.alabamabarreview.com

http://spam.arizonabarreview.com

http://spam.californiabarreview.com

http://spam.coloradobarreview.com

http://spam.connecticutbarreview.com

http://spam.floridabarreview.com

http://spam.georgiabarreview.com

http://spam.hawaiibarreview.com

http://spam.idahobarreview.com

http://spam.iowabarreview.com

http://spam.kybarreview.com

http://spam.louisianabarreview.com

http://spam.mainebarreview.com

http://spam.michiganbarreview.com

http://spam.minnesotabarreview.com

http://spam.mississippibarreview.com

http://spam.missouribarreview.com

http://spam.nevadabarreview.com

http://spam.nybarreview.com

http://spam.oklahomabarreview.com

http://spam.oregonbarreview.com

http://spam.pabarreview.com

http://spam.scbarreview.com

http://spam.tennesseebarreview.com

http://spam.texasbarreview.com

http://spam.utahbarreview.com

http://spam.vabarreview.com

http://spam.wabarreview.com

http://spam.wvbarreview.com

http://spam.wisconsinbarreview.com

Spammers

There's probably more, but that's enough spam for the day. MER-C 12:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Edenrage and athomenet.com

Would appreciate somebody keeping an eye on this...

Clear conflict of interest and abuse of WP:EL etc. I would have blocked if I had done the digging earlier rather than get involved. See the voluminous discussions at:

Appreciated/wangi (talk) 21:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

It appears that the Meteorite and meteorite related articles are very popular places for commercial websites to add links to their sites. We spent several hours yesterday removing dozens of links and "references" to commercial websites (see edit history). Today user Basilicofresco has replaced all of these links to commercial websites.

We were under the impression that external links to commercial websites were frowned upon? Were we mistaken? Also it does not seem appropriate for a commercial website to be repeatedly and inappropriately referenced (up to 4 times) within a single paragraph, even if that website puts up some "informational" pages on their commercial website? e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enstatite_chondrite

Did we misunderstand Wikipedias anti spam guidelines?


Sincerely


Mannheim 34 (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Not every "dot com" address is a "commercial" address. Sites we want to avoid are ones whose placement on Wikipedia is intended to promote the site or any products it sells. Sites like [29] are welcome if they are properly referenced in the articles as they constitute reliable sources. A commercial link in the "external links" section of an article is much more suspect. ThemFromSpace 18:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
I fully agree with Themfromspace. I really hate commercial promotion on Wikipedia but... we cannot ban a useful, informative and properly referenced webpage because on a different page on that site there is something for sale. As you can see these are not web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising as stated in Wikipedia:External links. These weblinks are not promoting products. We simply cannot use a "dealer list" to ban domains on sight. Well yes, I feel someone just failed to understand the meaning of antispam guidelines. Please discuss before start a edit war. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 22:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


Virtually all of the Sites that were removed as "Commercial" sites can be found on this list of Commercial Dealers:

http://www.meteorite.com/dealer_list.htm


If advertising as a commercial dealer doesn't make a site commercial then what does?

Mannheim 34 (talk) 19:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Please read my answer few lines above. BTW are we talking about the same page? I mean: where do you see objectionable amounts of advertising in [30]? OhNoitsJamie pointed out that "that there are plenty of academic sources that meet reliable sources guidelines", but the guideline does not encourage the use of primary sources (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources) and in this field secondary sources are often easier to find and to understand than primary sources. For example primary sources may be not in english [31], hard to find or expensive to read [32] or pretty difficult to understand [33]. In my opinion both kind of sources can -an should- coexist because references are meant to be useful. Guidelines do permits them. Please consider to restore at least the most useful links. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 00:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


OK, ...SO WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS THAT IT'S OK TO SPAM WIKIPEDIA AS MUCH AS YOU LIKE SO LONG AS YOU LINK TO A PAGE ON A COMMERCIAL WEBSITE W/ A LITTLE BIT OF "INFORMATION" ON IT. KIND OF LIKE AN MINI-INFOMERCIAL. THANKS FOR CLARIFYING WIKIPEDIA'S ANTI-SPAMMING GUIDELINES. FROM NOW ON WE WILL BE SURE THAT WE TELL OUR FRIENDS IN ADVERTISING TO PUT A LITTLE "INFORMATION" IN ALL OF THE ADVERTISEMENTS, UH, I MEAN "REFERENCES" THAT THEY ADD TO WIKIPEDIA.

INCREDIBLY, WIKIPEDIA WAS ACTUALLY ONCE CONSIDERED BY SOME TO BE A SOURCE OF SOMEWHAT RELIABLE INFORMATION. WE RECENTLY EXAMINED HUNDREDS OF WIKIPEDIA "REFERENCES" AND "EXTERNAL LINKS" AND FOUND A HUGE NUMBER, IF NOT MAJORITY OF THEM BLATANTLY LINKING DIRECTLY TO COMMERCIAL WEBSITES. AFTER BRINGING THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS SO CALLED ANTI-SPAM GROUP IT IS CLEAR FROM THE RESPONSE THAT THIS TYPE OF SPAMMING IS ACTUALLY ENCOURAGED HERE AT WIKIPEDIA. IN FACT SOME EDITORS APPEAR TO GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO ADD MORE SPAM IN THE GUISE OF "REFERENCES". IN OUR OPINION, THIS TYPE OF PROFLIGATE SPAMMING DEBASES WIKIPEDIA EVEN FURTHER AND MAKES IT JUST ABOUT AS RELIABLE A SOURCE OF INFORMATION AS AN INFOMERCIAL FROM THE COAL INDUSTRY. AFTER THE PATHETIC NEWS ABOUT A PROMINENT WIKIPEDIA ADMINISTRATOR http://www.itworld.com/nlsblog070306 IT DOESN'T SEEM THAT WIKIPEDIA NEEDS ANY MORE NEGATIVE PUBLICITY...

WE FIND IT PARTICULARLY INTERESTING THAT COMPANIES OF THE LIKE OF AIG, CITIGROUP, MERRIL LYNCH, STATE FARM, REMAX REALTY, OVERSTOCK.COM, AND THOUSANDS OF OTHER MEGA CORPORATIONS, ALL HAVE FREE FULL PAGE ADVERTISEMENTS, UH-I MEAN IMPORTANT WIKI PAGES, WITH MULTIPLE LINKS TO THEIR COMMERCIAL WEBSITES. I GUESS WIKIPEDIA'S "RULES" ABOUT SPAMMING ARE JUST FOR THE LITTLE PEOPLE...

MAYBE ONE OF WIKIPEDIA'S SPAMOPHILES WOULD LIKE TO EXPLAIN WHY WIKIPEDIA GIVES POWERFUL MEGA-CORPORATIONS PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT WITH FREE FULL PAGE ADVERTISEMENTS AND MULTIPLE LINKS TO THEIR WEBSITES, WHILE CLAIMING TO FIGHT SPAM AND REPRESENTING ITSELF AS AN UNBIASED SOURCE OF RELIABLE INFORMATION?


Mannheim 34 (talk) 05:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

what we give preference to is informative sites. There are many hobbyist sites where we do link to small specialist dealers who despite commercial orientation, provide the best available information of subjects. More often, larger companies do. They both have an ultimate ulterior purpose in mind , of establishing them as authorities. But they both can be of great value none the less in special circumstances. The best known examples -- and in the print era -- known to me are the CRC Handbook, and the Merck Manual. Produce something like that and we will link. DGG (talk) 07:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


DGG It is glaring obvious to anyone that actually bothers to check wikipedias so called "references" that wikipedia is a spammers paradise. Your feeble attempt to justify spammers as being "authorities" of some kind and as having "the best available information" clearly demonstrates exactly why this wannabe encyclopedia had degenerated to that state that it has.

Mannheim 34 (talk) 15:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You're obviously not familiar with the two examples I mentioned, DGG (talk) 20:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


I have to say that there is some truth in what Mannheim 34 says. I have often seen a site with googleadsense described as commercial spam (and removed from Wikipedia) - whilst websites which may charge people a good deal of money to advertise (ie are full-blown commercial sites) are not so described nor are they removed. JaneVannin (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

greenroofs.com

Link
Accounts

Spamming of links to multiple articles that are only tangentically related. Also, the author has an apparent WP:COI with the linked articles (user name the same as the author of the articles linked). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

What do spams do???

What do they do? Do thay hack your computer or something??

user:fuzzyhair2 —Preceding undated comment added 15:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC).

they diminish confidence in the material in the encyclopedia. They remove the distinction between Wikipedia and Google. Both good things, but for different purposes. DGG (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

history-for-kids.com

Link
Accounts

Accounts adding links to "childrens poems" into multiple articles; the added links provide no additional factual material. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

User:KrissyPope

Accounts

Adding "advertorial" spam for Sports Marketing Group (SMG) to multiple sports articles. Obvious pattern of edits to highlight SMG as source of various studies of questionable relevance to articles. Simishag (talk) 22:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.baeblemusic.com

baeblemusic.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 00:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.explore.org

explore.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers

MER-C 00:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Updated. MER-C 05:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Adsense pub-0397881907573464

Sites spammed

http://spam.friendee-freda.com

http://spam.pocuk.com

http://spam.mdocuk.co.uk

http://spam.toyotabbclub.com

http://spam.tlocuk.co.uk

http://spam.nx3.co.uk

http://spam.stepwagonclub.com

Spammers

MER-C 11:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Related domains:
Additional account:
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 00:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 00:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Editor 72.194.208.71

Editors

Links

Multiple warnings and a likely coi (these sites all appear to be run by the same organization). I think a blacklisting is more appropriate given the content of the sites. --Ronz (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
The editor has been given a 24 hr block for continuing the spamming. I still think we'll need the blacklisting. --Ronz (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

khwajagharibnawaz.net

khwajagharibnawaz.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com personal web site, asking for donations: khwajagharibnawaz.net/urssharif.htm.

Spammed from at least four IP addresses: [34] [35] [36] [37] dougweller (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC) And [38] dougweller (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Still spamming.
Spammers
MER-C 08:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Updated. Template:Deferblack MER-C 06:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
And again. Also:
MER-C 04:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

http://spam.abbasiandcompany.com

Template:Spamlink

Spammers

MER-C 13:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

fonte: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2009_Archive_Mar_1
Marcações: