Talk:Advanced Audio Coding
WikiProject Computing | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]() Archives |
---|
Archive 1 |
Biased?
This article seems kinda biased like, "Oh my god AAC is amazing and the best quality ever and a million times better then MP3."
Just seems that way. Just sayin' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.22.231 (talk) 08:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- So you have sensed the problem too! Yes, the problem exists but it is not exactly being biased. This article never even imply such a thing that you said; but it is obvious that at least one of the major contributors was a geek who was fascinated by the standard. This is easily visible from lack appropriate cohesion and consistency: Often, the article paragraphs are suddenly interrupted by detailed explanations of features of AAC. This is more evident in lead section and the beginning of the history section. This article needs copy-editing. Fleet Command (talk) 09:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
mp3 is a pretty crappy standard, there are far better audio-codex out there (without the patent issue). Markthemac (talk) 23:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)